Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for electronics and electrical engineering professionals, students, and enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What does the moving iron voltmeter measure in a circuit, average voltage, \$V_{average}\$, or RMS voltage, \$V_{rms} \$?

\$V_{average}=\frac{1}{T}{\int_{0}^{T}vdt} \$

\$V_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{1}{T}\int_{0}^{T}v^2dt} \$

share|improve this question
@PeterMortensen Adding the link is very laudible but it makes the OP appear a tad stupid or lazy because the paragraph linked to states that a MI meter measures RMS. – Andy aka Mar 8 '14 at 11:33

A moving iron meter measures true RMS theoretically.

A moving coil meter measures average, or if connected to a DC source it will measure positive and negative depending on the polarity of the source. This means that on an AC signal the positive movements of the needle are countered by the negative movements of the needle and the needle stays where it is (at zero) because it isn't quick enough (too much mass) to follow the signal as it cycles through its waveform.

A moving iron meter doesn't have a permanent magnet - it relies on the magnetic attraction from the current in the coil to "pull" a piece of iron. Positive current in the coil has the same "pull" as negative current.

The two meters are fundamentally different.

But does a moving iron meter measure RMS. Consider the formula for the force exerted on a magnetizable object from current in a loop: -

Force = \$(N\cdot I)^2 \dfrac{μ_0\cdot A}{(2 g^2)}\$


  • μ0 = 4π×10-7
  • F is the force in Newtons
  • N is the number of turns of the coil
  • I is the current in Amps in the coil
  • A is the area in length units squared (cross sectional area of the coil)
  • g is the length of the gap between the coil and the iron.

Force is proportional to amps squared and this of course produces a non-linear pull on the iron with respect to linear current but the fact that it is a squared term tells us that the force is proportional to RMS.

enter image description here

This picture was taken from here. As the current through the coil increases, the plunger is drawn further into the coil and the pointer deflects to the right.

Wattmeter - a little more to consider

The moving iron meter is the basis for the dual-moving-coil wattmeter and this measures true power: -

enter image description here

In the wattmeter, what was formerly a moving iron in the volt or ammeter becomes a coil excited with the line AC voltage and because current and voltage have the same frequency (but variable phase due to the load), the two magnetic fields interact to give true power. This sort of device can also be made from Hall-effect sensors and indeed, Landis and Gyr (formerly made electricity meters) patented this "no moving parts" method.

share|improve this answer
If understand well, the moving iron meter can display RMS values of every waveform even the arbitary one. Wattmeter used another technology and you are correct on this. – GR Tech Mar 8 '14 at 13:24
@GRTech correct - it relies on the square of the current in the winding to produce a force on the "iron" and as RMS current is \$I^2 R\$ it works as an RMS ammeter. For a voltmeter there are many more turns (to prevent significant loading effects) but the current in the coil is proportional to voltage (except at very high frequencies, alleviated by the "gap" aka high reluctance), therefore it also measures RMS voltage. – Andy aka Mar 8 '14 at 13:27
@ Andy aka Last question. Why the scale is non-linear as I can see in the above pictures ? – GR Tech Mar 8 '14 at 13:34
I think the explanation indicates the meter measures on a linear scale the MS, mean squared, not the RMS. Conversion is accomplished thru a non linear scale. – russ_hensel Mar 8 '14 at 13:56
@GRTech as russ_hensel has said the "basic" moving iron meter measures mean-squared signal (requiring a non-linear scale) but a simple advance in the mechanics / shape of the "iron" meant a linear scale was introduced. – Andy aka Mar 8 '14 at 14:06

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.