Take the 2-minute tour ×
Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for electronics and electrical engineering professionals, students, and enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Datasheets of current transformers usually specify a working frequency range. In other words, they specify a minimum and maximum frequency for normal operation.

I understand that the core losses grow exponentially with frequency. So the datasheets give an upper limit for frequency. But, why is there a lower frequency limit? What happens when we apply an AC current to the input of a current transformer with a frequency lower than the rated minimum frequency?

An example product:
EPCOS B82801B Series
Frequency range: 50 kHz ... 1 MHz

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 4 down vote accepted

For a voltage transformer: -

If the applied voltage were very low in frequency i.e. 0.1 Hz, the primary current taken (if the voltage were 120VAC or 230VAC) would be several tens of amps and the winding would fry and burn. Nonetheless, what about trying it at 1VAC? Now the current (remember we're talking 0.1 Hz) is a couple of hundred milliamps (that's OK) and the flux is just about avoiding saturation (phew) but, a decent flux rate of change is needed to produce the requisite voltage in the secondary and at 0.1 Hz it aint changing that quick so you get a really small output. No big deal output voltage and input voltage are still approximately related by the turns ratio but you can't connect to live and neutral anymore because it'll burn.

At some point above (maybe) 35 Hz, you can run full voltage.

Current transformer

Primary current is always defined by the "external circuit" - that's good because now we don't need to worry about saturation or the current getting bigger at lower frequencies. Normally the current transformer has a burden resistor of 1 to 100 ohms and this totally swamps the magnetization impedance; consider, at 50 Hz the mag inductance is 10 uH - this has a reactance of 3.14 milliohms. Now the burden may be 10 ohms and the winding ratio maybe 1:200 - referred to the primary the 10 ohms is 40,000 times smaller at 250 micro ohms. The mag inductive reactance (3 milliohms) is swamped by the primary-referred burden of 250 micro ohms.

At 5 Hz the burden is still 250 micro ohms and the mag reactance is 300 micro ohms - see how things are changing - what this means is that the CT at low frequencies can no-longer sustain the maths that underlies it. At 0.5 Hz the output will be negligible because the primary referred burden resistance is totally swamped by the extremely small magnetization impedance.

Equivalent circuits of VT and CT

enter image description here

Comparing CT with VT, you can forget about the primary DC resistance, leakage inductance and core losses - all you have a fat wire going thru a hole and it generates magnetism hence Xm is still present. If the secondary leakage impedances are small compared to the burden, then you can usually forget these as well. What remains is the burden (redirected to be on the primary) in parallel with Xm and, the burden normally dominates i.e. it is the lowest impedance because of turns-ratio-squared.

share|improve this answer
Thanks for correcting me and teaching! +1 –  horta Jul 15 at 21:33
Ha! Me too :) I missed the "current" part of the current transformer. Thanks! –  bitsmack Jul 15 at 21:46
Could the turns ratio be 1:200 in your example? –  hkBattousai Jul 16 at 0:18
@hkBattousai oops - well spotted on the typo!!!! –  Andy aka Jul 16 at 7:18
Will the reflected burden resistor be in series or parallel with \$X_m\$ in your equivalent model? –  hkBattousai Jul 16 at 10:15

Non-superconducting current transformers have a rolloff below a certain frequency, so the output for a given current simply goes down as the frequency decreases. It's not core saturation nor is it directly related to the inductance- this is a linear effect.

The -3dB rolloff frequency is determined from L/R where L is the inductance of the transformer secondary and R is the resistance of the secondary circuit.

Take the case of the B82801B0504A050, which has a recommended 50R load and inductance of 500uH looking into the secondary. The L/R constant is 10usec, corresponding to a -3dB frequency of 16kHz. So the error at the rated 50kHz should be minimal.

share|improve this answer
Its the primary magnetization inductance being low impedance at low frequencies that spoils the game. –  Andy aka Jul 15 at 21:43
@Andyaka Hmm.. amperes * turns should be the same regardless of frequency when it's driven with a constant current, so I don't see how the primary inductance enters into it directly. What am I missing? –  Spehro Pefhany Jul 15 at 22:12
The reflected impedance of the burden to the primary is normally at least ten times lower than the ct primary mag Reactance hence, it dominates and the device acts as one expects. At low frequency, the mag inductive Reactance is lower than the reflected burden and the burden does not receive the current it deserves but that's life! –  Andy aka Jul 15 at 22:29
How did you find 16kHz frequency from the 10\$\mu\$s time constant? –  hkBattousai Jul 15 at 23:52
@hkBattousai \$\omega\$ = 2\$\pi \$f –  Spehro Pefhany Jul 16 at 0:11

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.