Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for electronics and electrical engineering professionals, students, and enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

As many of you probably know, a normal light emitting diode, while very handy as a cheap and ubiquitous indicator, can double as a power generator. The mechanism is the same that is exploited in photovoltaic cells, aka solar panels.

When an LED is exposed to light it produces a current flowing from anode to cathode. This current can be used to directly power a device, or to charge a capacitor so that a periodic load can use the stored charge all at once, when needed.

To give you a better idea of the values involved, the short circuit current ranges from tens of nanoamps up to a few microamps, while the open circuit voltage is somewhat less than the standard forward voltage of the LED.

I am currently in the process of choosing a range of LEDs to test them and see if they are suitable for my application, but I am kinda stuck, mainly because using a led to power something is convenient only money wise, while a photovoltaic cell or even a photodiode is a better choice under many other aspects. No manufacturer that I have seen list the photogeneration current in the datasheet, and this seems fair enough to me, but since I want to avoid testing thousand of LEDs I would like to buy a selected range of them, so I need to better understand the underlying mechanism that leads to photogeneration.

Let's just write down the diode equation: $$ I_D = I_s(e^{\frac{V_D}{V_t} - 1})-I_G $$

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

Where \$I_s=J_s\cdot A\$ is technology dependent, and die area dependent. \$I_G\$ is the generation current, and is the parameter I am interested in maximizing.

Here are some things I have thought of:

LED color since the LED can absorb a lightbeam only if the energy it carries is greater than the gap, choosing LED with low energy (i.e. low frequency) gap is a must, to be able to absorb a wider portion of the spectrum. This lead me to choose red or infrared LEDs.

max current max forward current is proportional to die area, and power dissipation capabilities. Since photogenerated current is proportional to area, choosing an high current LED seem wise to me.

forward voltage this is somewhat related to the open circuit voltage and is not currently an issue for me, and I believe it has no relationship with photogenerated current.

reverse current I am not sure this has much to do with photogenerated current, but the bigger the reverse current, the bigger the area, which is a good thing.

breakdown voltage I do not think this has a relationship with photogeneration.

My question finally is:
Do you agree with my analysis, and do you think I am missing something?
or better
What are the parameters to look at when searching for a photovoltaic panel in the LED section of a supplier?

share|improve this question
    
I recommend you do some actual numbers and see how many nW you would be able to extract... – PlasmaHH Feb 17 at 15:09
6  
You can get useful power from an LED: Powering an AVR microprocessor (unintentionally) using an LED here. – bigjosh Feb 17 at 16:10
1  
Why would an LED, as opposed to a photodiode, which is optimized to the function, be right for your application? – Scott Seidman Feb 17 at 17:21
1  
Because it is cheaper and already present on the platform. Again, this is not the point of my question. I am not trying to solve a problem providing a solution, I want to discuss the mechanism of photogen in an LED and understand if a normal LED datasheet can give more hints than I thought of. – Vladimir Cravero Feb 17 at 17:23
1  
Probably obvious, but if I were looking for LEDs for this applicaiton, I would favor those with clear packages. Colored or frosted packages will lower conversion efficiency. Higher-rated LEDs might correspond to larger dies and thus conversion area. – JS. Feb 17 at 21:37

LED color -- I agree here; LEDs with lower-energy optical emission should have an effectively wider 'absorption band' in the visible spectrum.

reverse current -- I think this could be problematic. As this is a 'porosity problem' with the underlying diode, I see it presenting a likely loss-path for some/all of your photogenerated current. I would (short of contrary experimental data) look for LEDs with a lower leakage, proportional to forward current.

One item I didn't notice in your list, but think it may prove to be an important factor:
Conversion efficiency -- In my experience with using other components 'backwards,' a component that functions more efficiently when electrically powered (as designed) is nearly always more efficient when electrically generating. Thus, I'd highly recommend using LEDs with proportionally higher light output/electrical power efficiency ('color temperature' may not apply here, due to the LED color argument).

share|improve this answer

I believe you are missing something - collector area. LEDs are made with very small chip dimensions, something like a millimeter on a side. This means that when generating power it intercepts only a very small amount of optical power for "reasonable" light intensities.

Furthermore, although I can't prove it, I suspect that LEDs will only respond to light within its emission band, which will severely reduce the efficiency of the LED as a power generation device when used with a broadband source such as the sun or ambient light. You can test this easily enough - try illuminating an LED with an LED of a different color.

share|improve this answer
    
I also have that suspicion. I found some data floating on the net stating that RGB leds are much better for this exact reason. – Vladimir Cravero Feb 17 at 16:36

You should google Forrest Mims and LED as detector. Here's my first hit. Forrest did this back in the 80's(?) And I think he's still using LED's for their spectral selectivity.

share|improve this answer

As my previous answer is announced to be deleted, what I can say is what I know and not speculating beyond. If I have no knowledge of the chemistry of green LEDs that makes them sensitive to light, am sorry. Am exposing only what I do know.

Green LEDs are the ones that have the best response as photo detectors/generators. I tested and demonstrated to my employer, manufacturer of very high level audio processing equipment, that green LED indicators on the front panel were inducing spikes back into the circuitry in events as photographic flashes. Green LEDs are also used in heliostats for sun light tracking/sensing. Their output is very modest, but do generate better than other colors. The web should also disclose the behavior mostly in heliostat sun tracking circuits, and I did build one myself years ago to kill mold in my north wall.

share|improve this answer

Color (and forward voltage) will have an impact that you have not accounted for - as forward voltage varies with color, so the power you get for a given current varies with color/forward voltage.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.