No, 1.93 Ω is not correct. It's not the 1.93 (I didn't even calculate it), it's the dimension. A dB value is dimensionless; you divide two number of the same quantity, so their units cancel, and that's a good thing, otherwise you couldn't calculate the logarithm of the ratio. A logarithm returns a dimensionless number, so times 20 (also dimensionless, and why 20??) it can never suddenly become a resistance.
Besides, sinds dBs are found by taking the logarithm you don't divide them, you subtract them. At least if they use the same reference. Apples and oranges. You can still convert dBm to dBW, because they both express power, but there's no relationship between a current in dB and a voltage in dB.
I think the answer is that there is no answer here.
edit
On the other hand(!), nobody can stop you from defining a dB scale for resistors, only to go there from voltage and current you have to define references for the three of them.
Let's assume the following
0 dB\$_{SV}\$ = 1 V ("SV" = Steven's Volts :-))
0 dB\$_{SA}\$ = 1 A
0 dB\$_{SR}\$ = 1 Ω
Then a voltage of 10 V = 20 dB\$_{SV}\$ across a 1 Ω = 0 dB\$_{SR}\$ resistance causes a 10 A = 20 dB\$_{SA}\$ current, and we can find dB\$_{SR}\$ = dB\$_{SV}\$ - dB\$_{SA}\$. (A factor 20 for current is because power is proportional to current squared, so it's the same as for voltage.)
Other example: 1000 V across a 10 Ω resistor = 100 A. Then 60 dB\$_{SV}\$ = 20 dB\$_{SR}\$ + 40 dB\$_{SA}\$. So this seems to work. Why? Because we started by choosing our zero dB for a correct relationship between the three. If we had chosen 0 dB\$_{SR}\$ to be 1 mΩ then we would have to add an offset of 60 dB each time: 10 V across a 1 Ω resistor = 10 A. Then 20 dB\$_{SV}\$ = 60 dB\$_{SR}\$ + 20 dB\$_{SA}\$ - 60 dB.
So you can define a dB scale for resistance, but its reference is tied to those for your voltage and current scales, on penalty of an offset. Due to Ohm there's a relationship between voltage, current and resistance, but note that you can't go from one quantity to the other without the third.