Tell me more ×
Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for electronics and electrical engineering professionals, students, and enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have an application in which an RFID reader demands 200 mA of current when it attempts to read an RFID tag. For some reason the current switcher power supply either can't supply enough current or can't supply a clean enough voltage and I end up with a poor performance on the reader.

I want to use a standard LM7805CT regulator in place of the switcher, but how large of a capacitor should I use? The datasheet suggests 0.1 uF, but I'm not sure that is large enough since the reader gets turned on and off a lot.

I am regulating down from a 24 V battery (it is pushing the limit of that particular regulator, but I will add active heatskinking to it).

share|improve this question

2 Answers

up vote 4 down vote accepted

The 100 nF capacitor on the output is an important component for the stability of the regulator's control loop. It's not there to catch fast load changes; for that its value is too low.

A voltage regulator needs a short time to respond to load changes. This may seem like an imperfection but it's a requirement actually; a regulator with zero delay would not be stable.

Switching the reader on and off causes fast load changes. It won't be anything like 1 A/µs (which is damn fast), but fast enough to let the 5 V output sag for a moment. Russell calculated a value of 40000 µF to allow a 100 ms holdup, but you won't need that, the LM7805 will respond much faster than that (I would love to see more dynamic performance graphs in datasheets, especially step response!). For 200 mA steps a value of 100 µF should be fine. If you want to add a much larger value, like the 40000 µF it should be at the regulator's input, not the output.

edit
The guys at Diodes do include dynamic performance data in their AP1117 datasheet:

enter image description here

This shows an output voltage spike of a mere 15 mV for a 700 mA load change. The LM7805 is a much older design, and the figures won't be that good, but they give you an idea.
(end of edit)

I second Russell's suggestion for a series resistor to take most of the dissipation away from the regulator. At 200 mA a 56 Ω resistor will still give you 8 V input with a battery voltage of 20 V. The resistor will dissipate 2.25 W, so take a 5 W part for that. At 24 V in the regulator will have to handle 1.6 W, which it can do with a moderate heatsink. (Russell get a much lower dissipation, but he doesn't have any headroom in case the input voltage will sag.)

share|improve this answer

Use an air cooled power resistor in series with the regulator to drop most of the voltage. No heat sink needed. Run regulato at say 8V in. Presistor at 200 mA = VxI = (24-8) x 0.2 = 3.2 Watt. Pregulator = (8-5) x 0.2 = 0.6 Watt.

7805 regulators are very ancient. Better performance modern ones exist.

If your reader does not ever draw > 200 mA then a 1A regulator will handle it with ease if the input supply can provide the current.

Read data sheet. LM7805 says larger capacitors can be used at output if desired.
C ~= t x I / V
Where t = holdup or current supply time
I = current drawn
V = voltage droop during time t
C = capacitance.

At 200 mA, 0.5V droop, 0.1S holdup
C = 0.1 x 0.2 / 0.5 = 0.04F = 40 mF = 40,000 microfarad.
Usually much less is OK.
There is no reason why the regulator cannot do this mostly by itself if Iin is adequate.

share|improve this answer
Russell, what's the 0.1 s holdup for? There's still a regulator there, which will respond in milliseconds. I don't think you'll need much larger than 470 uF. If you want a larger capacitor I'd put it at the input. – stevenvh Aug 1 '12 at 16:17
Ahh, sorry I mean a LM7805CT regulator from Fairchild (I don't really know what the different letters mean). I don't know if that changes your answer or not. Also, 40mF is a very large capacitor isn't it? – Faken Aug 1 '12 at 16:20
1  
@stevenvh - randomish choice just as an example. As I said and as you know, the regulator should do fine as is if Iin is OK. – Russell McMahon Aug 1 '12 at 16:21
XX7805yy are almost all old and tired. A fine device in its day but getting tired. Still usable of course. – Russell McMahon Aug 1 '12 at 16:22
2  
@RussellMcMahon What similar newer regulators would you recommend? – m.Alin Aug 1 '12 at 16:34
show 1 more comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.