| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | 19 | |
| visits | member for | 11 months |
| seen | May 15 at 9:05 | |
| stats | profile views | 12 |
I'm doing my Bachelor's degree in Electronics. Known for being lazy.
|
Apr 15 |
accepted | Feedback for DC Motor Speed Control using PID |
|
Apr 15 |
comment |
Feedback for DC Motor Speed Control using PID Well I don't think I'm going to get any more answers and I've decided to go with an optical encoder. I appreciate your help on the matter! |
|
Apr 13 |
comment |
Feedback for DC Motor Speed Control using PID This is a great idea! I have a couple of questions though. Could I not do as Anindo Ghosh mentioned in a comment and use a frequency to voltage converter instead? Then I could invert the output voltage for negative feedback. On the other hand, if I use v to f conversion, I understand how the phase comparator would work but how would a XOR gate work? Logic chips are allowed and thank you for your help! |
|
Apr 12 |
revised |
Feedback for DC Motor Speed Control using PID deleted 16 characters in body |
|
Apr 12 |
comment |
Feedback for DC Motor Speed Control using PID @ChrisStratton : It doesn't matter if the range is limited since it's only meant to be a proof of concept. So basically I could use a multi-turn pot and connect it to a differentiator op-amp? This would also give me an output voltage proportional to the velocity right? Thanks for the idea! |
|
Apr 12 |
comment |
Feedback for DC Motor Speed Control using PID @DaveTweed : Sorry I seem to have misused the word. What I mean to say is, I can't use a tacho generator for this project because they're generally too expensive,unless there are more cost efficient options available. How would I go about using the back EMF? This is actually a project for my Control Systems course. |
|
Apr 12 |
asked | Feedback for DC Motor Speed Control using PID |
|
Nov 16 |
accepted | RC time constant in astable multivibrators |
|
Nov 15 |
comment |
RC time constant in astable multivibrators Thanks the link was very helpful. However I still don't understand why we use the time it takes to move halfway to its final value while charging. Is it just an arbitrary value we used for convenience? I feel like I'm missing something obvious.. |
|
Nov 14 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Nov 14 |
comment |
RC time constant in astable multivibrators Thank your for replying. I'm still somewhat confused about this. If the values/formulas vary, then why is the same formula used with transistor based astable multivibrators? Is it just a coincidence? Also isn't the LS123 a monostable multivibrator? |
|
Nov 14 |
asked | RC time constant in astable multivibrators |
|
Nov 12 |
comment |
Decoupling caps with PICs @Kaz - Thanks for the suggestion but I looked through the datasheet and wasn't able to find it. I might have missed it though. |
|
Nov 12 |
accepted | Decoupling caps with PICs |
|
Nov 11 |
comment |
Decoupling caps with PICs @WoutervanOoijen - To be honest I was concerned about this. I was considering adding a dc jack along with the battery but it seemed odd for my project(digital thermometer). Do you have any suggestions? |
|
Nov 11 |
comment |
Decoupling caps with PICs Thank you! That makes sense but I have one more question. Why do we even need those caps at all considering that the source is pretty stable? Is it just a precaution? |
|
Nov 11 |
asked | Decoupling caps with PICs |
|
Nov 4 |
accepted | Bjt astable multivibrator questions |
|
Nov 4 |
comment |
Bjt astable multivibrator questions @OliGlaser - Well I got it working. I might decide to use a dual gang pot or something. I'm going to mark this as solved but I have one little question. These circuits are using common emitter configurations. You mainly use these for voltage gain or inverted output. The voltage gain is -VC/VB (IC*RC / IB *RB). So basically the voltage gain is really small and we're using the inverted output for switching right? Thank you for all the help! |
|
Nov 3 |
comment |
Bjt astable multivibrator questions Thank you for replying. I plan to use 10nF caps with high resistor values at the base. That's ok right? For my application it might make it a bit more confusing to calculate the frequencies but would using a single pot still be acceptable? (to get a range from around 30kHz to 45kHz or so) |