Timeline for Why are two transistors often used instead of one?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S May 16, 2014 at 0:18 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed grammar, added alt text
|
| May 16, 2014 at 0:16 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 16, 2014 at 0:18 | |||||
| May 15, 2014 at 16:19 | comment | added | Lesto | double transistor is not needed if using PNP, as logic level shift does not happen | |
| May 15, 2014 at 13:56 | answer | added | Russell McMahon♦ | timeline score: 9 | |
| May 15, 2014 at 13:33 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackElectronix/status/466934293638680576 | ||
| May 15, 2014 at 12:26 | vote | accept | Nate | ||
| May 15, 2014 at 11:19 | comment | added | pjc50 | Using one transistor would invert the signal. Two transistors inverts it back again. | |
| May 15, 2014 at 11:08 | answer | added | primax | timeline score: 23 | |
| May 15, 2014 at 11:02 | history | asked | Nate | CC BY-SA 3.0 |