2 Emphasized on significance of presence of polar capacitor.
source | link

Having different types of capacitors (electrolytic, film, silicon, tantalum, etc.), which of themtypes would be the optimal choice for polar/non-polar pair in this common configuration:

enter image description here

WhyI understand the reason for having two or more caps of different capacitance values. Though wonder, why does the pair includes a polarpolar and a non-polarnon-polar capacitor? What would be the type priority order for each? Is it essential to include onea polar capacitor, or it's OK to use two non-polar caps?

The application is for bypassing power supply for opAmps, ADCs, DACs, microcontrollers, and other low power ICs up to 100MHz bandwith. I know that electrolytic ones would be too big for surface mounting apps.

Having different types of capacitors (electrolytic, film, silicon, tantalum, etc.), which of them would be the optimal choice for polar/non-polar pair in this common configuration:

enter image description here

Why does the pair includes a polar and a non-polar capacitor? What would be the type priority order for each? Is it essential to include one polar capacitor?

The application is for bypassing power supply for opAmps, ADCs, DACs, microcontrollers, and other low power ICs up to 100MHz bandwith. I know that electrolytic ones would be too big for surface mounting apps.

Having different types of capacitors (electrolytic, film, silicon, tantalum, etc.), which types would be the optimal choice for polar/non-polar pair in this common configuration:

enter image description here

I understand the reason for having two or more caps of different capacitance values. Though wonder, why does the pair includes a polar and a non-polar capacitor? Is it essential to include a polar capacitor, or it's OK to use two non-polar caps?

The application is for bypassing power supply for opAmps, ADCs, DACs, microcontrollers, and other low power ICs up to 100MHz bandwith. I know that electrolytic ones would be too big for surface mounting apps.

    Post Closed as "duplicate" by tcrosley, Daniel Grillo, Leon Heller, Chetan Bhargava, PeterJ of
1
source | link

Bypass/decoupling capacitor type choice

Having different types of capacitors (electrolytic, film, silicon, tantalum, etc.), which of them would be the optimal choice for polar/non-polar pair in this common configuration:

enter image description here

Why does the pair includes a polar and a non-polar capacitor? What would be the type priority order for each? Is it essential to include one polar capacitor?

The application is for bypassing power supply for opAmps, ADCs, DACs, microcontrollers, and other low power ICs up to 100MHz bandwith. I know that electrolytic ones would be too big for surface mounting apps.