Timeline for Prevent high-side BJT saturation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2020 at 20:15 | comment | added | jjstcool | Unbelievably good answer. I was searching this a whole day, as I found this years ago, and didn't remember where. I even did some surgery on myself, to have more thumbs to give you: four thumbs up! | |
| Aug 3, 2011 at 22:45 | comment | added | BarsMonster | Hi again, could you take a look at my comments to 'Olin Lathrop' answers at this question : electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/16994/… : I was trying to improve performance on slow fronts. | |
| Jun 25, 2011 at 18:20 | comment | added | BarsMonster | Just finished my PCB for that - push-pull + 2 T-triggers... Getting 15-20ns fronts... But got problem with edge detection - electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/15979/… - maybe you'll have some clues... | |
| Jun 20, 2011 at 17:44 | comment | added | zebonaut | I'm flattered. But hey, the question was cool, and when there's a reason for hacking a breadboard, I'm all in for the fun anyway, time permitting. Especially when standard parts are involved that I can take from my drawers of junk boards. Also, breadboarding even simple circuits is probably one of the nicest ways to not forget Jim Williams, the greatest breadboard hacker of all times: edn.com/article/… Sad, sad, news... This is one of his nicest pieces: cds.linear.com/docs/Application%20Note/AN128f.pdf | |
| Jun 20, 2011 at 2:41 | history | bounty ended | BarsMonster | ||
| Jun 19, 2011 at 2:29 | comment | added | BarsMonster | Your 3rd update makes your answer just unbeatable. Starting +500 bounty just for you :-) | |
| Jun 12, 2011 at 18:45 | history | edited | zebonaut | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved formatting
|
| Jun 10, 2011 at 19:16 | history | edited | zebonaut | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved formatting and some phrases.
|
| Jun 8, 2011 at 21:48 | history | edited | zebonaut | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
| Jun 8, 2011 at 21:40 | history | edited | zebonaut | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add picture of breadboarded circuit and oscillograms.
|
| Jun 7, 2011 at 0:09 | comment | added | BarsMonster | You added even more awesomeness :-) I am printing PCB at the moment for this test... | |
| Jun 6, 2011 at 22:07 | history | edited | zebonaut | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
yay breadboard
|
| Jun 6, 2011 at 20:43 | history | edited | zebonaut | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 430 characters in body
|
| Jun 6, 2011 at 20:36 | history | edited | zebonaut | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Jun 6, 2011 at 20:08 | history | edited | zebonaut | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add schematic and picture
|
| Jun 6, 2011 at 16:24 | vote | accept | BarsMonster | ||
| Jun 6, 2011 at 16:23 | vote | accept | BarsMonster | ||
| Jun 6, 2011 at 16:24 | |||||
| Jun 6, 2011 at 16:22 | comment | added | BarsMonster | What a perfect answer, that works perfectly now :-) 5k was there just because I found that there is a balance between capacitance charge speed & saturation slow-down. Now lower values gives better performance, Thanks alot :-) | |
| Jun 6, 2011 at 8:54 | history | edited | zebonaut | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 42 characters in body
|
| Jun 6, 2011 at 8:19 | history | edited | zebonaut | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 447 characters in body
|
| Jun 6, 2011 at 7:58 | history | answered | zebonaut | CC BY-SA 3.0 |