Timeline for 915 MHz FCC Certification
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2015 at 5:01 | comment | added | Some Hardware Guy | Agree on that intentional radiator testing costs way more than just class b too. I updated my answer to point you to relevant docs, but forgot to leave comment about it. | |
| Feb 13, 2015 at 4:55 | comment | added | tcrosley | @rith87 Verifying that your product doesn't emit unwanted emissions via lab testing will get you an FCC ID (stamp as you call it). Compared to the cost of testing (many thousands of dollars) any FCC fees will be minimal. | |
| Feb 13, 2015 at 4:04 | vote | accept | rith87 | ||
| Feb 13, 2015 at 3:22 | history | edited | Some Hardware Guy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1758 characters in body
|
| Feb 13, 2015 at 2:13 | comment | added | rith87 | Thanks for the response! I understand that 15.249 has the rules and regulations for operating a 915 MHz radio. However, my question was if certification is required for a 915 MHz radio and where is the relevant section. My confusion is if compliance (e.g. I verify that my product doesn't break any rules in 47 CFR 15 through some lab testing) is sufficient or if I need to go through the FCC to get an actual stamp. | |
| Feb 12, 2015 at 13:51 | history | answered | Some Hardware Guy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |