Timeline for Best oscilator scheme for watch crystal
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2011 at 0:36 | vote | accept | BarsMonster | ||
| Jul 18, 2011 at 1:21 | comment | added | BarsMonster | Surely, it's hard to do better than 0. Better = better long-term stability, less stress on the crystal | |
| Jul 16, 2011 at 23:02 | comment | added | Olin Lathrop | @Bars: "Better" is in relation to some spec. If better includes low parts count, then probably no. | |
| Jul 16, 2011 at 22:50 | comment | added | BarsMonster | That is for digital clock, so there will be micro. The question is can it be done better than micro. | |
| Jul 16, 2011 at 22:10 | history | answered | Olin Lathrop | CC BY-SA 3.0 |