Timeline for Can superimposed (combined) wireless signals create a health hazard?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2016 at 16:39 | history | edited | Null♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 12, 2016 at 0:17 | vote | accept | John | ||
| Jan 8, 2016 at 0:43 | comment | added | John | Updated the main question with further context too in case you guys have any more to add. Good responses so far though!! thanks! | |
| Jan 8, 2016 at 0:41 | history | edited | John | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 871 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2016 at 0:40 | comment | added | John | hhmm but there must be a threshold of danger no? I mean there must be a point where your body's own electric field is being distorted due to the influence of another electric field to the point where your heart doesn't beat properly, your cells incorrectly function. etc.. | |
| Jan 7, 2016 at 23:17 | comment | added | user1582568 | The field strength falls as you move away from a transmitter, following the inverse square of the distance. This means that as you approach a transmitter the field strength becomes much greater the the combined field from many relatively distant ones. If you ever come across a dangerously high field strength it is likely to be due to close proximity to one high powered transmitter. | |
| Jan 7, 2016 at 23:11 | answer | added | pjc50 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 7, 2016 at 22:47 | comment | added | user16324 | I should add ... no solid evidence, other than the effect of nuclear EMP on electronics. You can even be fairly close to a lightning strike, which generates extremely high amplitude RF pulses, with no ill effect. (Directly in the path is another matter! :-) | |
| Jan 7, 2016 at 22:38 | comment | added | R. Johnson | As @BrianDrummond says its not impossible but in order to have an infinitly building wave you would have to have enough wireless devices that have the perfect frequency shift such that NONE of the wireless devices cancels out another one. | |
| Jan 7, 2016 at 22:31 | comment | added | user16324 | If you buy into the idea that there is a hard "threshold of danger" then yes. But it's been well over a hundred years with no solid evidence for one - even in the days when transmitters used spark gaps... | |
| Jan 7, 2016 at 22:27 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 8, 2016 at 7:38 | |||||
| Jan 7, 2016 at 22:23 | history | asked | John | CC BY-SA 3.0 |