Timeline for Would there be any problem putting reverse-parallel diodes in parallel with the inputs of a microammeter?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2012 at 17:13 | vote | accept | supercat | ||
| Oct 25, 2011 at 13:52 | answer | added | Russell McMahon♦ | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 25, 2011 at 1:56 | answer | added | markrages | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 24, 2011 at 17:34 | answer | added | Russell McMahon♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 24, 2011 at 17:24 | history | edited | supercat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 852 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2011 at 17:16 | comment | added | supercat | Sounds interesting, though it doesn't sound like it solves the problem with the device having occasional peak currents which are much higher than those one wants to measure. On the 1,000uA scale (which would be the one I'd probably use most) the series resistance is 10 ohms, which would drop a full volt at 100mA. | |
| Oct 24, 2011 at 16:26 | comment | added | vicatcu | you should get a uCurrent from @eevblog... eevblog.com/projects/ucurrent or at least read about it :-) | |
| Oct 24, 2011 at 16:12 | history | asked | supercat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |