Timeline for Workaround for the obsolete ATTINY15 1.5Mhz clock for FCC exemption?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:33 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://electronics.stackexchange.com/ with https://electronics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Aug 7, 2016 at 4:09 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackElectronix/status/762138506802106370 | ||
| Aug 7, 2016 at 3:13 | answer | added | Tom Carpenter | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 7, 2016 at 2:41 | history | edited | bigjosh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 9 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Aug 6, 2016 at 22:30 | comment | added | pipe | Isn't this exemption pretty unclear anyway. I've seen a lot of questions about it, but never any answers, and the regulations seem to contradict themselves. | |
| Aug 6, 2016 at 22:22 | answer | added | Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams | timeline score: 12 | |
| Aug 6, 2016 at 22:14 | comment | added | bigjosh | @IgnacioVazquez-Abrams that would certainly work, but hoping to avoid adding unnecessary parts. Question updated to reflect. Thx. | |
| Aug 6, 2016 at 22:13 | history | edited | bigjosh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 58 characters in body
|
| Aug 6, 2016 at 22:07 | comment | added | jonk | Can you use a spread spectrum oscillator? | |
| Aug 6, 2016 at 22:06 | comment | added | Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams | There's always strapping a crystal to one of the other ATtinyX5s. | |
| Aug 6, 2016 at 22:04 | history | asked | bigjosh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |