Timeline for RC time constant calculation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2016 at 22:02 | vote | accept | DimChtz | ||
| Aug 28, 2016 at 19:38 | answer | added | jonk | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 28, 2016 at 18:31 | answer | added | Mario | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 28, 2016 at 18:29 | comment | added | Bimpelrekkie | 1) partly, you correctly deduced that only R2//R4 matter regarding the time constant. R1, R3 and R5 do nothing and can be ignored. You do not need the voltage divider formula as a voltage divider is time invariant. It does not change the timings, it only scales voltages. 2) depends on where the caps are, if you can combine all into one cap it is same as here. If not you get a 2nd (or higher) order response so then there are more time constants in the circuit. | |
| Aug 28, 2016 at 18:15 | history | asked | DimChtz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |