Timeline for Efficient way to regulate voltage
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 2, 2012 at 17:54 | comment | added | clabacchio | @supercat it was just for completeness, talking about Dc-Dc. But it may be seen as "less trouble in getting the right output" eventually | |
Apr 2, 2012 at 15:43 | comment | added | supercat | I'm not sure how "linearity" would be defined as a useful feature in this context. The advantages of a linear regulator would generally be cost, lack of injected noise on input and output, and (in some cases) ability to respond quickly to changing load conditions. The fact that a switcher's supply current draw increases with decreasing supply voltage may in some cases cause battery voltage to drop more "suddenly", but the effect won't be overly large when using a buck converter for moderate step-down ratio, and it's a result of drawing less current from a good battery than would a linear. | |
Apr 2, 2012 at 8:02 | comment | added | AndrejaKo | @cmd1024 I explained that in detail in this answer. Take a look at the values of the voltage in simulations there. If you need the simplest solution that works reliably, you'll need a linear regulator. The bad side is that they literally waste extra voltage as heat, but the up side is that in most cases you only need the regulator and two capacitors to make it work. | |
Apr 2, 2012 at 7:56 | comment | added | user16307 | hello mate thanks for your answer. i wonder what do you mean by "current output unbalances the divider"? i need a very simple solution, i am new in electronics. | |
Apr 2, 2012 at 7:51 | history | answered | clabacchio | CC BY-SA 3.0 |