Skip to main content
added 516 characters in body
Source Link
dannyf
  • 4.4k
  • 1
  • 8
  • 9

Am I missing something?

charging up a R/C/LED circuit at Vcc is very much like charging up a R/C circuit with Vcc-Vfwd where Vfwd is the forward voltage of the LED.

So 63% of Vcc in this case (about 3 V) should really be compared to time constant of 3 V under a Vcc of 5 V - 2.2 V = 2.8 V < 3 V. Which is very very long, as you observed.

edit: here is a quick simulation that may help explain the difference between a rcled and rc circuit.

The circuit on the right is a rcled being charged up at 9v. the circuit on the right is its equivalent rc circuit being charged at Vcc - Vfwd. The curves are roughly the same - but not exactly due to the much higher equivalent resistance of the led as charge current slows down.

hope it helps visualize it for the OP.enter image description here

Am I missing something?

charging up a R/C/LED circuit at Vcc is very much like charging up a R/C circuit with Vcc-Vfwd where Vfwd is the forward voltage of the LED.

So 63% of Vcc in this case (about 3 V) should really be compared to time constant of 3 V under a Vcc of 5 V - 2.2 V = 2.8 V < 3 V. Which is very very long, as you observed.

Am I missing something?

charging up a R/C/LED circuit at Vcc is very much like charging up a R/C circuit with Vcc-Vfwd where Vfwd is the forward voltage of the LED.

So 63% of Vcc in this case (about 3 V) should really be compared to time constant of 3 V under a Vcc of 5 V - 2.2 V = 2.8 V < 3 V. Which is very very long, as you observed.

edit: here is a quick simulation that may help explain the difference between a rcled and rc circuit.

The circuit on the right is a rcled being charged up at 9v. the circuit on the right is its equivalent rc circuit being charged at Vcc - Vfwd. The curves are roughly the same - but not exactly due to the much higher equivalent resistance of the led as charge current slows down.

hope it helps visualize it for the OP.enter image description here

added 84 characters in body
Source Link
Marcus Müller
  • 100k
  • 5
  • 141
  • 262

Am I missing something?

charging up a R/C/LED circuit at VccVcc is very much like charging up a R/C circuit with VccVcc-VfwdVfwd where VfwdVfwd is the forward voltage of the ledLED. so

So 63% of VccVcc in this case (about 3v3 V) should really be compared to time constant of 3v3 V under a VccVcc of 5v5 V -2 2.2v2 V = 2.8v8 V < 3v ->3 V. Which is very very long, as you observed.

Am I missing something?

charging up a R/C/LED circuit at Vcc is very much like charging up a R/C circuit with Vcc-Vfwd where Vfwd is the forward voltage of the led. so 63% of Vcc in this case (about 3v) should really be compared to time constant of 3v under a Vcc of 5v-2.2v = 2.8v < 3v -> very very long, as you observed.

Am I missing something?

charging up a R/C/LED circuit at Vcc is very much like charging up a R/C circuit with Vcc-Vfwd where Vfwd is the forward voltage of the LED.

So 63% of Vcc in this case (about 3 V) should really be compared to time constant of 3 V under a Vcc of 5 V - 2.2 V = 2.8 V < 3 V. Which is very very long, as you observed.

Source Link
dannyf
  • 4.4k
  • 1
  • 8
  • 9

Am I missing something?

charging up a R/C/LED circuit at Vcc is very much like charging up a R/C circuit with Vcc-Vfwd where Vfwd is the forward voltage of the led. so 63% of Vcc in this case (about 3v) should really be compared to time constant of 3v under a Vcc of 5v-2.2v = 2.8v < 3v -> very very long, as you observed.