Skip to main content
24 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 3, 2018 at 4:00 answer added Garry timeline score: -1
Oct 26, 2017 at 16:58 answer added Coder_fox timeline score: 2
Oct 26, 2017 at 14:45 comment added user20088 @ilkkachu true, but what I was saying is that I seldom see any (ZIF or not) IC sockets in new designs (even slots are more and more rare nowadays IMO); most circuits are designed to be replaced entirely in case of fault, and are not suited to be serviced on a by-part basis. ZIFs are gold when it comes to programming or other batch work (e.g. part testing), but they occupy a lot of space on proto board (I haven't seen any ZIF smaller than DIP14 for DIPs, so it kind of sucks for DIP8), so for regular "replace easily if burned/damaged/unsuitable" situations, I'd go with regular DIP sock.
Oct 26, 2017 at 10:39 comment added ilkkachu @vaxquis, for mass programming, I'd want to use a ZIF socket or about anything else but a regular DIP socket. They're not that good for repeatedly plugging the chips in and out.
Oct 26, 2017 at 6:59 vote accept dusk
Oct 25, 2017 at 23:35 comment added user20088 @OlinLathrop to each his own; On the contrary - I actually used sockets for virtually all of my projects from the last 5 years. AFAIK, you're a professional (I'm speaking in the literal sense, i.e. somebody who does something for a living), so obviously yeah, in "serious" designs IC sockets went mostly obsolete a long time ago (for the obvious reasons, DIP going mostly obsolete for most of the applications being the first of them); still, in small scale prototyping and hobby design, they can be real lifesavers (e.g. having a programmer and needing to program 50 ATtinies out of circuit etc.).
Oct 25, 2017 at 18:53 answer added Mark Lakata timeline score: 6
Oct 25, 2017 at 18:05 history edited dusk CC BY-SA 3.0
Fix title s.t. it's actually a question
Oct 25, 2017 at 14:24 answer added calcium3000 timeline score: 11
Oct 25, 2017 at 13:34 answer added dirac16 timeline score: 6
Oct 25, 2017 at 13:20 answer added Trevor_G timeline score: 11
Oct 25, 2017 at 12:30 history tweeted twitter.com/StackElectronix/status/923164943888904192
Oct 25, 2017 at 12:00 answer added jpa timeline score: 17
Oct 25, 2017 at 10:56 comment added Neil_UK If you use sockets, you always have to bear in mind that an additional failure mode, when you're debugging, could be poor contact between the socket and the IC pin. I've only had one or two per decade through my engineering career, few enough to lull you into a false sense of security, enough to be a major hiccup when you forget the possibility.
Oct 25, 2017 at 10:46 comment added Olin Lathrop "Sockets" brings back memories, not all pleasant. I think the last time I used a IC socket was so I could plug in the ICE instead of the real microcontroller. That was probably around 15 years ago. The last time I used a socket for a non-microcontroller IC was probably in the 1980s due to the prototypes being wire wrapped.
Oct 25, 2017 at 10:37 answer added 0___________ timeline score: 33
Oct 25, 2017 at 10:31 answer added Scott Seidman timeline score: 24
Oct 25, 2017 at 10:17 comment added Dampmaskin You get tens of socket for a dollar on the fleabay. There are many reasons to not use sockets, but cost ain't one of them.
Oct 25, 2017 at 10:13 comment added Turbo J ESD could also damage your component when soldering - and many cheaper soldering irons are not properly grounded.
Oct 25, 2017 at 10:13 comment added PlasmaHH Have you considered that you might want to save money by reusing an IC on another board? Desoldering DIPs can be a pita, especially on boards with much copper and tiny holes.
Oct 25, 2017 at 10:05 comment added jonk Sockets require space and volume and add their own reliability problems. But the Wikipedia comment is also accurate.
Oct 25, 2017 at 10:03 answer added Manu3l0us timeline score: 20
Oct 25, 2017 at 10:00 review First posts
Oct 25, 2017 at 10:40
Oct 25, 2017 at 9:55 history asked dusk CC BY-SA 3.0