Timeline for FCC verification for PCB business card?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2020 at 15:10 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Aug 24, 2018 at 3:03 | history | edited | Voltage Spike♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1925 characters in body
|
| Aug 24, 2018 at 2:51 | comment | added | Voltage Spike♦ | Sorry, I forgot about subassemblies I'll edit the question. | |
| Aug 24, 2018 at 0:36 | comment | added | Joey Shepard | in that case, it would a subassembly, which does not seem to need regulation according to the exceptions in 15.102 referring to unintentional regulators, right? | |
| Aug 23, 2018 at 23:24 | comment | added | Voltage Spike♦ | Yes, the device you describe would most likely be defined as a CPU board, other than those used in a personal computer. Anything with a CPU or a frequency generation device is an unintentional radiator and is regulated as such. In all of the products I design, I also have to list the frequency so the ETL that does our FCC testing can make sure that frequency does not exceed the unintentional radiator limits | |
| Aug 23, 2018 at 23:10 | comment | added | Joey Shepard | I see that it is not under section 15.102 but I am asking about 15.101 on subassemblies: CPU boards, as defined in §15.3(bb), other than those used in personal computers, that are marketed without an enclosure or power supply | |
| Aug 23, 2018 at 22:47 | history | answered | Voltage Spike♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |