Timeline for Discrepancy between EMF measures
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2019 at 22:26 | comment | added | Bento | Okay, after a little search, that makes sense, but the correct data are 30-60 uT, not Gauss. I guess the problem is so solved | |
| May 27, 2019 at 21:08 | vote | accept | Bento | ||
| May 27, 2019 at 21:07 | comment | added | Bento | sorry, I was wrong: It says to overcome the inconvenience of interferences by fields of the internal electronic circuits | |
| May 27, 2019 at 20:30 | comment | added | Bento | Do you mean that the measure by the phone might be falsified by geographic mf? But the app says that to overcome this inconvenience it tries to take calibrate field from the system.. and anyway 35 uT seems to be an exaggerate value. Moreover, why does the external tester says almost null field? Is it perhaps calibrate in order not to consider Earth emf? | |
| May 27, 2019 at 20:11 | history | edited | D.A.S. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 25 characters in body
|
| May 27, 2019 at 20:06 | history | answered | D.A.S. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |