Timeline for What would a voltmeter measure if you had an electromotive force generated by a changing magnetic field?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
27 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2021 at 1:30 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
the term "voltage" can refer to different physical things each measured in "volts"
|
| Sep 26, 2021 at 11:27 | comment | added | Math Keeps Me Busy | @AlejandroNava. No. Faraday's law gives us the magnitude of the induced emf (the rate of change of enclosed flux). Kirchhoff's law states that the sum of the (resistive) voltage drops in a closed loop is equal to the emf in that loop. See hsm.stackexchange.com/a/13612/14184 for Kirchhoff's law. | |
| Sep 26, 2021 at 7:11 | comment | added | alejnavab | “Kirchhoff's voltage law states that the sum of all voltage drops in a closed loop is equal to the emf in that loop” // Isn’t that Faraday’s law? | |
| Mar 26, 2021 at 17:19 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 225 characters in body
|
| Mar 26, 2021 at 16:14 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 169 characters in body
|
| Mar 26, 2021 at 15:55 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added diagram from OP
|
| Mar 26, 2021 at 15:47 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 17 characters in body
|
| Mar 26, 2021 at 15:38 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
removed tangential content -- it is still available in edit history if needed
|
| Mar 26, 2021 at 15:33 | comment | added | Math Keeps Me Busy | @Buraian I am "deleting" the "addendum" part of my answer, because I feel it is tangential to the main questions in your post. However, it is not permantly lost, and can be viewed in the edit history. | |
| Mar 26, 2021 at 4:26 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 88 characters in body
|
| S Mar 7, 2021 at 6:59 | history | mod moved comments to chat | |||
| S Mar 7, 2021 at 6:59 | comment | added | Voltage Spike♦ | Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. | |
| Mar 7, 2021 at 0:32 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
missing brace
|
| Mar 6, 2021 at 23:54 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
minor changes
|
| Mar 6, 2021 at 23:48 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
removing what I think is an extra q
|
| Mar 6, 2021 at 23:39 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 23 characters in body
|
| Mar 6, 2021 at 23:22 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
major rewrite
|
| Mar 6, 2021 at 13:33 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 95 characters in body
|
| Mar 6, 2021 at 13:25 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
whether or not the measurement circuit loops with the return flux will affect reading.
|
| Mar 6, 2021 at 13:12 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
cases of distributed and confined return flux
|
| Mar 6, 2021 at 12:48 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
plane of the triangle
|
| Mar 6, 2021 at 5:24 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
removing challenged section relating to counter-factual thought experiment. Magnetic fields are solenoidal.
|
| Mar 5, 2021 at 21:47 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
confining magnetic field within triangle not possible, but low flux density is.
|
| Mar 4, 2021 at 18:00 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Why I think Electroboom is correct in debate with Dr. Lewin
|
| Mar 4, 2021 at 14:03 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
answer question in comment.
|
| Mar 4, 2021 at 13:34 | history | edited | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added discussion of Electroboom and Dr. Lewin
|
| Mar 4, 2021 at 13:11 | history | answered | Math Keeps Me Busy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |