Timeline for Cable shielding adequate for video, but not audio frequencies
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2021 at 12:14 | history | edited | danmcb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 218 characters in body
|
| May 25, 2021 at 12:12 | comment | added | danmcb | @MathKeepsMeBusy yes, my bad. I need to look again more closely. But somewhere I am still highly sceptical of what he is purporting to show here. | |
| May 25, 2021 at 11:34 | comment | added | Math Keeps Me Busy | Thank you for your first hand experience. Regarding the interference being RF, if you watch the video carefully, you see that he has reversed the roles of "attacker" and "victim". He is feeding an audio signal through the cable and picking up an electric field outside the cable. By the reciprocity principle, that means an electric field outside the cable could induce a noise signal in the cable. But the noise in this case is clearly audio frequency. | |
| May 25, 2021 at 11:26 | history | edited | danmcb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 20 characters in body
|
| May 25, 2021 at 10:37 | history | edited | danmcb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 10 characters in body
|
| May 25, 2021 at 10:27 | history | edited | danmcb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| May 25, 2021 at 9:19 | history | answered | danmcb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |