Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 13 at 16:06 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Sep 8, 2021 at 22:45 answer added user173271 timeline score: 1
Sep 8, 2021 at 16:07 comment added electrovolt The internal emitter resistance should be the one causing the problems, but getting to bypass it should have caused minimal problems. That doesn't happen of course, when I simulate.
Sep 8, 2021 at 16:05 comment added electrovolt No, the voltage gain. I've inserted the picture as well.
Sep 8, 2021 at 15:44 comment added G36 Nonlinearity on the output waveform?
Sep 8, 2021 at 15:39 comment added electrovolt That does increase the AC gain, right? But, how to explain this non-linearity and why should I change the potentiometer bias to manage this?
Sep 8, 2021 at 15:34 comment added G36 By adding R9 and C5 you have decreased the amplifier input resistance. $$Z_{IN} \approx R_3||R_4||[ (\beta +1) (r_e + (R6||R9)) ]$$
Sep 8, 2021 at 15:29 comment added electrovolt It would be really helpful if someone would atleast respond.
Sep 8, 2021 at 14:04 history edited electrovolt CC BY-SA 4.0
added 444 characters in body
Sep 8, 2021 at 13:39 history edited electrovolt CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2 characters in body
Sep 8, 2021 at 13:30 history edited JRE CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 29 characters in body
Sep 8, 2021 at 12:38 history edited electrovolt CC BY-SA 4.0
added 408 characters in body
Sep 8, 2021 at 10:38 comment added electrovolt Tinkering around with R9 and C5, I switched their positions to create a high pass filter, and changed R9 to \$117\Omega\$ and C5 to \$510nF\$. This retained the 0.6V pk-pk input voltage, while maintaining the -50 AC gain.
Sep 8, 2021 at 9:54 history asked electrovolt CC BY-SA 4.0