Timeline for Transfer Function Involving Transformer
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 9, 2022 at 8:29 | answer | added | a concerned citizen | timeline score: 1 | |
May 9, 2022 at 0:06 | history | edited | thatstheguy9 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 22 characters in body
|
May 8, 2022 at 17:46 | answer | added | Antonio51 | timeline score: 0 | |
May 8, 2022 at 15:53 | comment | added | Jun Seo-He | @Hearth I guess he forgot the dots because M is the mutual inductance(see his equations). | |
May 8, 2022 at 15:45 | comment | added | Hearth | @JunSeo-He No, there is no indication of coupling. Isolation does not define a transformer, it's just something transformers are commonly used for. | |
May 8, 2022 at 12:51 | comment | added | Jun Seo-He | winny I agree with you .The OP has drawn 2 seperated inductors which are coupled to each other but they are not a transformer. | |
May 8, 2022 at 12:47 | comment | added | winny | @JunSeo-He In a real transformer yes, but what OP has drawn is not a transformer. | |
May 8, 2022 at 12:41 | comment | added | Jun Seo-He | winny is correct the primary windings from the secondary windings are isolated from each other. | |
May 8, 2022 at 12:39 | comment | added | winny | That’s not a transformer but two separate inductors. | |
May 8, 2022 at 12:36 | answer | added | D.A.S. | timeline score: 1 | |
May 8, 2022 at 11:52 | answer | added | Jun Seo-He | timeline score: 0 | |
May 8, 2022 at 11:48 | history | asked | thatstheguy9 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |