Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackElectronix/status/1570019561851813888
added 45 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
ocrdu
  • 9.3k
  • 23
  • 32
  • 42

RF impedance matching other than 50 OhmsΩ

I am working on an VHF down-converter, using the SA602. TheThe RF input impedance to this chip is 1.5k5 kΩ. II understand that hooking up to most antennas will require a 50 OhmΩ matching network. However, for this case I am wondering if I need a matching network at all?.

  1. Matching is to avoid losslosses from reflection. UsingI am Using the equation (lineline length/wavelenth) > 0.01, so any line length ratio to wavelength ratio longerlarger than 0.01 will have reflections. At
    At 140 MHz, if I keep the trace less than 1 inchlength to the antenna connection shorter than 1 inch, then transmission line effects can be ignored, correct?

  2. Even assuming a short transmission line, do I still need to design the antenna to have 1.5k5 kΩ impedance to satisfy the maximum power transfer theorem? Or would any antenna (receive only) be fine so long as it is tuned for 140 MHz?

Edit: To sum this up, I can design the antenna with 1.5k5 kΩ to match the IC input impedance of 1.5k5 kΩ. I understand 50 ohmsΩ would be needed if I waswere using a 50 coax or stripline, but the trace is around 1 inch. The antenna connection would be direct, no smaSMA or bncBNC (since those are 50 ohmΩ). I

I wanted to bounce this idea of off some RF gurus out there.

RF impedance matching other than 50 Ohms

I am working on an VHF down-converter, using the SA602. The RF input impedance to this chip is 1.5k. I understand that hooking up to most antennas will require a 50 Ohm matching network. However, for this case I am wondering if I need a matching network at all?

  1. Matching is to avoid loss from reflection. Using the equation (line length/wavelenth) > 0.01, so any line length ratio to wavelength ratio longer than 0.01 will have reflections. At 140 MHz, if I keep the trace less than 1 inch to the antenna connection, then transmission line effects can be ignored, correct?

  2. Even assuming a short transmission line, do I still need to design the antenna to have 1.5k impedance to satisfy the maximum power transfer theorem? Or would any antenna (receive only) be fine so long as it is tuned for 140 MHz?

Edit: To sum this up, I can design the antenna with 1.5k to match the IC input impedance of 1.5k. I understand 50 ohms would be needed if I was using a 50 coax or stripline, but the trace is around 1 inch. The antenna connection would be direct, no sma or bnc (since those are 50 ohm). I wanted to bounce this idea of off some RF gurus out there.

RF impedance matching other than 50 Ω

I am working on an VHF down-converter using the SA602. The RF input impedance to this chip is 1.5 kΩ. I understand that hooking up to most antennas will require a 50 Ω matching network. However, for this case I am wondering if I need a matching network at all.

  1. Matching is to avoid losses from reflection. I am Using the equation line length/wavelenth > 0.01, so any line length ratio to wavelength ratio larger than 0.01 will have reflections.
    At 140 MHz, if I keep the trace length to the antenna connection shorter than 1 inch, then transmission line effects can be ignored, correct?

  2. Even assuming a short transmission line, do I still need to design the antenna to have 1.5 kΩ impedance to satisfy the maximum power transfer theorem? Or would any antenna (receive only) be fine so long as it is tuned for 140 MHz?

Edit: To sum this up, I can design the antenna with 1.5 kΩ to match the IC input impedance of 1.5 kΩ. I understand 50 Ω would be needed if I were using a 50 coax or stripline, but the trace is around 1 inch. The antenna connection would be direct, no SMA or BNC (since those are 50 Ω).

I wanted to bounce this idea of off some RF gurus out there.

added 348 characters in body
Source Link

I am working on an VHF down-converter, using the SA602. The RF input impedance to this chip is 1.5k. I understand that hooking up to most antennas will require a 50 Ohm matching network. However, for this case I am wondering if I need a matching network at all?

  1. Matching is to avoid loss from reflection. Using the equation (line length/wavelenth) > 0.01, so any line length ratio to wavelength ratio longer than 0.01 will have reflections. At 140 MHz, if I keep the trace less than 1 inch to the antenna connection, then transmission line effects can be ignored, correct?

  2. Even assuming a short transmission line, do I still need to design the antenna to have 1.5k impedance to satisfy the maximum power transfer theorem? Or would any antenna (receive only) be fine so long as it is tuned for 140 MHz?

Edit: To sum this up, I can design the antenna with 1.5k to match the IC input impedance of 1.5k. I understand 50 ohms would be needed if I was using a 50 coax or stripline, but the trace is around 1 inch. The antenna connection would be direct, no sma or bnc (since those are 50 ohm). I wanted to bounce this idea of off some RF gurus out there.

I am working on an VHF down-converter, using the SA602. The RF input impedance to this chip is 1.5k. I understand that hooking up to most antennas will require a 50 Ohm matching network. However, for this case I am wondering if I need a matching network at all?

  1. Matching is to avoid loss from reflection. Using the equation (line length/wavelenth) > 0.01, so any line length ratio to wavelength ratio longer than 0.01 will have reflections. At 140 MHz, if I keep the trace less than 1 inch to the antenna connection, then transmission line effects can be ignored, correct?

  2. Even assuming a short transmission line, do I still need to design the antenna to have 1.5k impedance to satisfy the maximum power transfer theorem? Or would any antenna (receive only) be fine so long as it is tuned for 140 MHz?

I am working on an VHF down-converter, using the SA602. The RF input impedance to this chip is 1.5k. I understand that hooking up to most antennas will require a 50 Ohm matching network. However, for this case I am wondering if I need a matching network at all?

  1. Matching is to avoid loss from reflection. Using the equation (line length/wavelenth) > 0.01, so any line length ratio to wavelength ratio longer than 0.01 will have reflections. At 140 MHz, if I keep the trace less than 1 inch to the antenna connection, then transmission line effects can be ignored, correct?

  2. Even assuming a short transmission line, do I still need to design the antenna to have 1.5k impedance to satisfy the maximum power transfer theorem? Or would any antenna (receive only) be fine so long as it is tuned for 140 MHz?

Edit: To sum this up, I can design the antenna with 1.5k to match the IC input impedance of 1.5k. I understand 50 ohms would be needed if I was using a 50 coax or stripline, but the trace is around 1 inch. The antenna connection would be direct, no sma or bnc (since those are 50 ohm). I wanted to bounce this idea of off some RF gurus out there.

Source Link

RF impedance matching other than 50 Ohms

I am working on an VHF down-converter, using the SA602. The RF input impedance to this chip is 1.5k. I understand that hooking up to most antennas will require a 50 Ohm matching network. However, for this case I am wondering if I need a matching network at all?

  1. Matching is to avoid loss from reflection. Using the equation (line length/wavelenth) > 0.01, so any line length ratio to wavelength ratio longer than 0.01 will have reflections. At 140 MHz, if I keep the trace less than 1 inch to the antenna connection, then transmission line effects can be ignored, correct?

  2. Even assuming a short transmission line, do I still need to design the antenna to have 1.5k impedance to satisfy the maximum power transfer theorem? Or would any antenna (receive only) be fine so long as it is tuned for 140 MHz?