Skip to main content
added 3 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
ocrdu
  • 9.3k
  • 23
  • 32
  • 42

averaging Averaging time, T, of analog lock-in amp equivalent in digital lockinlock-in amplifier

myMy understanding of lock-in used to be only that of an analog lock-in amplifier.

Now, I am thinking about digital lock-in technique.

Reading this has been helpful.

However, I am having trouble identifying the digital lock-in's equivalent for the integration time found in the analog lock-in's multiplier unit.

Is this not the right way to think about the more modern lock-in, which actually doesnt have a multiplier unit but achieves high SNR measurement with the use of a mixer and LPF.

I would like to apply 'the integration of the product of the reference signal and the input signal' picture to the modern lock-in if there is a way. (thinking about the LPF in the time domain may be the way to do exactly that but I can't exactly put my finger on it)

averaging time, T, of analog lock-in amp equivalent in digital lockin amplifier

my understanding of lock-in used to be only that of analog lock-in amplifier.

Now, I am thinking about digital lock-in technique.

Reading this has been helpful.

However, I am having trouble identifying the digital lock-in's equivalent for the integration time found in the analog lock-in's multiplier unit.

Is this not the right way to think about the more modern lock-in, which actually doesnt have a multiplier unit but achieves high SNR measurement with the use of a mixer and LPF.

I would like to apply 'the integration of the product of the reference signal and the input signal' picture to the modern lock-in if there is a way. (thinking about the LPF in the time domain may be the way to do exactly that but I can't exactly put my finger on it)

Averaging time, T, of analog lock-in amp equivalent in digital lock-in amplifier

My understanding of lock-in used to be only that of an analog lock-in amplifier.

Now, I am thinking about digital lock-in technique.

Reading this has been helpful.

However, I am having trouble identifying the digital lock-in's equivalent for the integration time found in the analog lock-in's multiplier unit.

Is this not the right way to think about the more modern lock-in, which actually doesnt have a multiplier unit but achieves high SNR measurement with the use of a mixer and LPF.

I would like to apply 'the integration of the product of the reference signal and the input signal' picture to the modern lock-in if there is a way. (thinking about the LPF in the time domain may be the way to do exactly that but I can't exactly put my finger on it)

added 150 characters in body
Source Link
Blackwidow
  • 533
  • 6
  • 17

my understanding of lock-in used to be only that of analog lock-in amplifier.

Now, I am thinking about digital lock-in technique.

Reading this has been helpful.

However, I am having trouble identifying the digital lock-in's equivalent for the integration time found in the analog lock-in's multiplier unit.

Is this not the right way to think about the more modern lock-in, which actually doesnt have a multiplier unit but achieves high SNR measurement with the use of a mixer and LPF.

I would like to apply the'the integration of the product of the reference signal and the input signalsignal' picture to the modern lock-in if there is a way. (thinking about the LPF in the time domain may be the way to do exactly that but I can't exactly put my finger on it)

my understanding of lock-in used to be only that of analog lock-in amplifier.

Now, I am thinking about digital lock-in technique.

Reading this has been helpful.

However, I am having trouble identifying the digital lock-in's equivalent for the integration time found in the analog lock-in's multiplier unit.

Is this not the right way to think about the more modern lock-in, which actually doesnt have a multiplier unit but achieves high SNR measurement with the use of a mixer and LPF.

I would like to apply the integration of the product of the reference signal and the input signal if there is a way.

my understanding of lock-in used to be only that of analog lock-in amplifier.

Now, I am thinking about digital lock-in technique.

Reading this has been helpful.

However, I am having trouble identifying the digital lock-in's equivalent for the integration time found in the analog lock-in's multiplier unit.

Is this not the right way to think about the more modern lock-in, which actually doesnt have a multiplier unit but achieves high SNR measurement with the use of a mixer and LPF.

I would like to apply 'the integration of the product of the reference signal and the input signal' picture to the modern lock-in if there is a way. (thinking about the LPF in the time domain may be the way to do exactly that but I can't exactly put my finger on it)

Source Link
Blackwidow
  • 533
  • 6
  • 17

averaging time, T, of analog lock-in amp equivalent in digital lockin amplifier

my understanding of lock-in used to be only that of analog lock-in amplifier.

Now, I am thinking about digital lock-in technique.

Reading this has been helpful.

However, I am having trouble identifying the digital lock-in's equivalent for the integration time found in the analog lock-in's multiplier unit.

Is this not the right way to think about the more modern lock-in, which actually doesnt have a multiplier unit but achieves high SNR measurement with the use of a mixer and LPF.

I would like to apply the integration of the product of the reference signal and the input signal if there is a way.