Timeline for What is wrong with this function generator simulation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2022 at 1:47 | vote | accept | Koustubh Jain | ||
| Dec 2, 2022 at 14:17 | answer | added | glen_geek | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 2, 2022 at 14:06 | comment | added | a concerned citizen |
The total simulation time may be too large compared to the period of the oscillations so, even if you used startup, the timestep may have gotten too large by the time the oscillations actually started, resulting in the solver thinking there are none, to begin with. Try simulating for 1m or so. Increase/decrease as needed. Or, don't use startup and add ic=1 to C1, e.g. the value will look like 0.1u ic=1 (startup acts on both supplies and they mey be too symmetrical for something unusual to ahppen). Yet another thing is you could use a different opamp.
|
|
| Dec 2, 2022 at 14:03 | history | edited | winny | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Dec 2, 2022 at 14:01 | history | asked | Koustubh Jain | CC BY-SA 4.0 |