Skip to main content
added 346 characters in body
Source Link
periblepsis
  • 13.1k
  • 1
  • 6
  • 25

notenotes

With \$C_4=47\:\mu\text{F}\$ and \$f_0\approx 650\:\text{Hz}\$ the impedance is about \$5\:\Omega\$. (In quadrature.) If significantly lower frequencies are sought, then \$C_4\$ should be made proportionately larger.

Also, for \$R\approx 10\cdot R_{_\text{LOAD}}\$ and \$R\approx 10\cdot R_{_\text{SOURCE}}\$, which is close to the above case, then set \$\gamma=1.9\$. And for \$R\gg R_{_\text{LOAD}}\$ and \$R\gg R_{_\text{SOURCE}}\$ set \$\gamma=\sqrt{3}\$.

Then it appears there's a fairly simple equation: \$f_0\approx\frac1{2\pi\,\gamma\,R\,C}\$.

note

With \$C_4=47\:\mu\text{F}\$ and \$f_0\approx 650\:\text{Hz}\$ the impedance is about \$5\:\Omega\$. (In quadrature.) If significantly lower frequencies are sought, then \$C_4\$ should be made proportionately larger.

notes

With \$C_4=47\:\mu\text{F}\$ and \$f_0\approx 650\:\text{Hz}\$ the impedance is about \$5\:\Omega\$. (In quadrature.) If significantly lower frequencies are sought, then \$C_4\$ should be made proportionately larger.

Also, for \$R\approx 10\cdot R_{_\text{LOAD}}\$ and \$R\approx 10\cdot R_{_\text{SOURCE}}\$, which is close to the above case, then set \$\gamma=1.9\$. And for \$R\gg R_{_\text{LOAD}}\$ and \$R\gg R_{_\text{SOURCE}}\$ set \$\gamma=\sqrt{3}\$.

Then it appears there's a fairly simple equation: \$f_0\approx\frac1{2\pi\,\gamma\,R\,C}\$.

added 236 characters in body
Source Link
periblepsis
  • 13.1k
  • 1
  • 6
  • 25

note

With \$C_4=47\:\mu\text{F}\$ and \$f_0\approx 650\:\text{Hz}\$ the impedance is about \$5\:\Omega\$. (In quadrature.) If significantly lower frequencies are sought, then \$C_4\$ should be made proportionately larger.

note

With \$C_4=47\:\mu\text{F}\$ and \$f_0\approx 650\:\text{Hz}\$ the impedance is about \$5\:\Omega\$. (In quadrature.) If significantly lower frequencies are sought, then \$C_4\$ should be made proportionately larger.

added 310 characters in body
Source Link
periblepsis
  • 13.1k
  • 1
  • 6
  • 25

(I won't go into the details of how I got that. But it's just finding the transfer function. Here, hereit's numerator is an odd power of s, so I set the real part of the denominator equal to zero and solved. An even power in the numerator, had that been the case, would have meant setting the imaginary part of the denominator to zero before solving.)

(1/(2*pi*C*sqrt(rload*rsource+3*R*Rload*Rsource+3*R*(R+Rload+Rsource)))).subs({R:27e3,C:4.7e-9,Rsource:2.1e3,Rload:2000}).n()
674.120958877630
(1/(2*pi*C*sqrt(rload*rsource+3*R*Rload*Rsource+3*R*(R+Rload+Rsource)))).subs({R:27e3,C:4.7e-9,Rsource:2.1e3,Rload:200*(10+2.2)}).n()
669.289215790583

(I won't go into how I got that, here.)

(1/(2*pi*C*sqrt(rload*rsource+3*R*(R+Rload+Rsource)))).subs({R:27e3,C:4.7e-9,Rsource:2.1e3,Rload:2000}).n()
674.120958877630
(1/(2*pi*C*sqrt(rload*rsource+3*R*(R+Rload+Rsource)))).subs({R:27e3,C:4.7e-9,Rsource:2.1e3,Rload:200*(10+2.2)}).n()
669.289215790583

(I won't go into the details of how I got that. But it's just finding the transfer function. Here, it's numerator is an odd power of s, so I set the real part of the denominator equal to zero and solved. An even power in the numerator, had that been the case, would have meant setting the imaginary part of the denominator to zero before solving.)

(1/(2*pi*C*sqrt(Rload*Rsource+3*R*(R+Rload+Rsource)))).subs({R:27e3,C:4.7e-9,Rsource:2.1e3,Rload:2000}).n()
674.120958877630
(1/(2*pi*C*sqrt(Rload*Rsource+3*R*(R+Rload+Rsource)))).subs({R:27e3,C:4.7e-9,Rsource:2.1e3,Rload:200*(10+2.2)}).n()
669.289215790583
added 1116 characters in body
Source Link
periblepsis
  • 13.1k
  • 1
  • 6
  • 25
Loading
added 19 characters in body
Source Link
periblepsis
  • 13.1k
  • 1
  • 6
  • 25
Loading
added 65 characters in body
Source Link
periblepsis
  • 13.1k
  • 1
  • 6
  • 25
Loading
Source Link
periblepsis
  • 13.1k
  • 1
  • 6
  • 25
Loading