3
\$\begingroup\$

This circuit came in my today's exam. It asked to find every base, emitter and source current.Base emitter voltage .8 and \$\beta\$ for both BJT is 49.

first I tried normally where \$I_B\$ found that it is coming out from n type BJT and go into p type BJT which is not possible.

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

I also try for \$Q_p\$ saturation \$Q_n\$ active ; \$Q_n\$ saturation \$Q_p\$ active and both saturation. Every time I've found some impossible values which cancel that option. same thing happen to my other friends.

Is there any other condition I didn't consider? Is there any other situation or special situation happen?

\$\endgroup\$
8
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I think Qp is upside down - then it makes sense. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Jun 9, 2014 at 16:37
  • \$\begingroup\$ that's why I called it odd ... \$\endgroup\$
    – Anklon
    Jun 9, 2014 at 16:37
  • \$\begingroup\$ Qp is in right position. \$\endgroup\$
    – Anklon
    Jun 9, 2014 at 16:43
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ What if Qp is operating in reverse-active and Qn in active region? \$\endgroup\$
    – nidhin
    Jun 9, 2014 at 16:43
  • \$\begingroup\$ I see.... Qp can operate upside down but it's beta will be significantly reduced so if you regard Qp as having its emitter at the top then solve it like you would normally. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Jun 9, 2014 at 16:45

2 Answers 2

2
\$\begingroup\$

The collector junction of Qp and emitter junction of Qn - forward biased.

The collector junction of Qn and emitter junction of Qp - reverse biased.

now the base current of Qn is, $$I_{Bn} = \frac{V_1 - V_{BEn} - V_{CBp}}{R1+R5+(\beta+1)R4}$$ then, $$I_{Cn} = \mathrm{min}(\beta I_{Bn}, I_{Csat})$$ where $$I_{Csat} = \frac{V_1-V_{CEn}}{R_4+R_3}$$

The voltages you can calculate as.

$$V_{En} = R4\times(I_{Bn}+I_{Cn})$$ $$V_{Cn} = V_1 - R3\times(I_{Cn})$$ $$\text{so on ...}$$

\$\endgroup\$
4
\$\begingroup\$

Note that Qp is flipped collector to emitter from normal operation. However, it is still a P-N-P sandwich, so will still function as a PNP transistor with collector and emitter flipped, although its gain will be lower. It's C-B junction is forward biased, so you can assume the usual junction drop.

I'd start to analyze this assuming the gain of both transistors is infinite with something like 700 mV B-E drop and 200 mV in saturation. For this purpose, simply pretend the E and C of Qp are swapped. As I said above, it will still function as a transistor that way, just with lower gain than if used normally.

After you get a good idea what this circuit is doing with the above simplifying assumptions, you can go back and use some plausible finite values for the gain, if you think the answer is expected to have that level of detail.

Real transistor circuits usually need to be designed to work with transistor gain from some minimum value to infinity. Good circuits won't change their operating points much over that range. A really good answer to this question would be showing what the range of operating points are as the gain of Qp varies from 20 to inifinity and Qn from 50 to infinity, unless of course you were given more specific parameters you haven't told us about.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ sorry.. I forget to give value of beta. \$\endgroup\$
    – Anklon
    Jun 9, 2014 at 16:59
  • \$\begingroup\$ \$\beta\$ for both BJT is 49 \$\endgroup\$
    – Anklon
    Jun 9, 2014 at 16:59
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Anklon: In that case use 49 for the gain of Qn, but something lower for Qp. 20 is a plausible value. Keep in mind that calculating detailed operating points for specific transistor gains may be a good exercise for learning to compute these things, but that level of detail is down into meaningless precision in the real world. \$\endgroup\$ Jun 9, 2014 at 17:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.