3
\$\begingroup\$

Why are MOSFETs better than BJTs in application of Voltage Controlled Resistor ? Thanks for your responses.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ Where did you read this? In what context? What have you found so far? \$\endgroup\$
    – user36129
    Commented Mar 5, 2015 at 16:21

3 Answers 3

4
\$\begingroup\$

The following refers to NPN BJTs and N channel FETs

It's really hard to get good accurate representations of collector current versus collector-emitter voltage for different levels of base current. It's a bit easier for JFETs because, traditionally they claim to encompass the functionality of a voltage controlled resistor. Anyway, here are the best three I could find and they show a similar story: -

enter image description here

Top left is a BJT. Top right is a JFET. Bottom left is a MOSFET and bottom right I have drawn my own picture of the saturation/ohmic region. Basically, what I'm trying to say is that all three devices can be used as a voltage controlled resistor (VCR) because the base/gate control can vary the slope of the graph and the slope is basically conductance and that, in turn translates to resistance.

One thing that makes a JFET much more superior is that the drain current and voltage can be reversed (made negative) and the characteristic shape of the resistances are largely similar. They are not hi-fi quality the same but good enough for controlling volume in a cheap transistor radio or amplitude in a sine wave oscillator.

BJTs wobble a tad when the voltage is reversed because you are then relying on the transistor being symmetrical and having the same gain. MOSFETs usually (but not always) have a parasitic diode which makes them unsuitable for negative voltages when used as a VCR.

I'd go for JFETs every day.

As a footnote don't believe that the BJT characteristic looks like this: -

enter image description here

It completely fails to show the ohmic/saturation region properly, Rather, it seems to indicate that there is a one value of resistance irrespective of base current.

\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

Why are MOSFETs better than BJTs in application of Voltage Controlled Resistor ? Thanks for your responses?

If such a device should be able to act as a voltage-controlled resistor it should have a voltage-current characteristic that is (at least) similar to an ohmic resistor. In particular it should exhibit a symmetric behaviour in the vicinity of the origin (positive/negative current for positive/negative voltages). More than that, we reqire that I=0 for V=0.

It is to be noted that both requirements cannot be fulfilled with a bipolar transistor (BJT). This is because collector and emitter cannot be exchanged without a drastic change in voltage-current characteristic. More than that, for Vce=0 the current Ic does not cross the origin for any finite control voltage Vbe. Hence, the BJT cannot be used as avoltage-controlled resistor.

However the situation is completely different for FET´s in particular for JFET´s. These devices have another working principle than BJT`s - they can be seen as voltage controlled resistors within the so-called "linear" region (ohmic region) for rather small VDC values (up to 1V). And the resistance between D and S can be varied (controlled) with the voltage VGS.

\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

enter image description here

enter image description here

I have 2 images above. The first one is Ic vs Vce which i captured in a lab at university. The second I took off the internet of a FET because i didnt have one. In the FET one you can see that all the curves split off before they come flat. Giving a R = V/I for those curves will give different resistances. However, in my BJT one, you can see that before the curves become flat, they're all relatively close together, this means that R = V/I for all those curves will be slightly different, but more or less the same. Therefore, thats why MOSFETs can be used as a variable resistor, whereas BJTs can't really. I hope this helps

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.