I am glad you are happy with the design, I have a few comments not answers. The design might be great for linear loads, but poorly regulated for LEDs which prefer RMS current feedback.
If it is designed for 6.8W @17V or 400mA operating at 14%d.f for example , it is expecting to see a 17 / 0.4A = 42.5 Ohm linear load.
Unfortunately your load is non-linear and at with typical RGB LEDs operating at 17V with 400mA Max that won't be RMS . I estimate the LED array to have an ESR of about 2-5 Ohms at 400mA rms power or less , thus your current ripple is going to be 100% in Grn,Blue , but not R and is very senistive to the ESR in both 220uF caps, DCR of transformer, RdsOn of switcher and diode power ESR=1/Pd rating.
Is this acceptable to you? Also is your duty factor is a lot higher than design calc?
The problems with regulation and stability using a perfectly good regulator for a nonlinear load do not follow the rule of BOde plot phase margin , nor precise regulation and hence much higher gain error sensitivity to all parameters even with infinite gain in the 2.5V comparator with internal Vref. The feedback is mainly linear average voltage, rather than peak current or even RMS current.
As you know, the transfer function is nonlinear for any diode and with and array of 3P5S is offset by that Zener like threshold and amplified by the incremental slope of diode ESR such that for each colour, the string Voltage , Vs, is the same , but each string will equate a different current transfer function as follows;
\$Vs_{LED}=5*(V_f+I_f*ESR)\$. +Rs for 5*1V delta for Red with 5S string.
If your goal was to achieve the max. rated Lumen per LED with 400mA peak, equally shared by RGB and thus 133mA peak per colour with an RMS value of 65mA , each string if balanced would have a ratio of RMS/peak of 65/150= 1.3/3=0.43.
However given your feedforward conversion is half-wave sine the RMS/peak is closer \$1/\pi=0.32\$ this error is amplified by the voltage variance of \$If*ESR\$ which is controlled not by the ripple voltage but the difference between (17V-5*Vth+Rs) where Rs = 0 for Bl,Grn.
The two 220uF=440uF caps are probable chosen for the expected ripple with a linear load of 42.5 ohms giving a design parameter of a linear RC = 18.7 ms. With an optimistic ESR of 1 ohm then T=ESRC = 1*440uF= 440us. With pulse current at 60kHz, 1/f=16.7us However, the power ripple in the LEDs is not linear like a rectangular switched PWM and very sensitive to LED ESR variation, Cap ESR variation, Line input Vac range and variable load current if modulated by PWM.
You haven't reported power efficiency vs design goal, but I suspect losses are higher than estimates and sensitivity to Pout with each component loss parameter variations.