0
\$\begingroup\$

I want to use an antenna for my project and want to use it in the frequency domain: 1GHz to 10 GHz. Is it possible to use a single antenna with dynamic input range? I read about reconfigurable antenna's but couldn't find anything concrete on it.

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • \$\begingroup\$ Look up ultrawideband antennas, for PCB antennas I would look at spiral antennas. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 19, 2016 at 16:07
  • \$\begingroup\$ What radiation pattern is needed? \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Commented Dec 19, 2016 at 16:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ Perhaps a Log Periodic antenna? Or if you can live with a minimum frequency of more like 2.5-3GHz, perhaps this ultra wideband chip antenna \$\endgroup\$
    – Sam
    Commented Dec 19, 2016 at 22:31
  • \$\begingroup\$ I am looking for UWB antenna, I did find some Vivaldi antenna after picking up the keywords from your responses , Thanks. \$\endgroup\$
    – U7786
    Commented Dec 31, 2016 at 13:46

1 Answer 1

2
\$\begingroup\$

So, you can of course have something like a monopole antenna in a telescopic way, that you attach some motor to that changes the length – but to be honest, that'd be a bit awkward.

I'd recommend using something in between 2 and 5 separate antennas that all cover their share of the spectrum – for example, the first one could cover 1.0 – 1.6 GHz, the second 1.6 – 3.4 GHz, the next one 3.4 – 5.8 GHz, and the next one 5.8 – 10.6 GHz. That way, the relative bandwidth, ie $$\frac{f_{max}-f_{min}}{f_{center}}$$ would be roughly constant 0.5 for all antennas, and thus, you wouldn't need to build ultra-wideband antennas.

It's mathematically hard to build an antenna where this relative bandwidth gets large, but with self-complementary antennas like the Vivaldi antenna (if you need some directional gain) or self-complementary spiral antennas, one can achieve amazin bandwidths.

Note that saying "I need an antenna that covers 1 to 10 GHz" does sound a little unwise. It's extremely hard to build circuitry that works at 10 GHz the same way it works on 1 GHz, and antennas also typically serve a certain purpose. You don't even mention that – but it very much defines the types of antennas that are feasible for any given application. You might want to sit down and more exactly define your system's overall capabilities / requirements and then come back to ask more well-defined questions about your antenna.

In other words: the way you ask this question reflects a lack of understanding of RF principles, and thus, I doubt you have a system that would actually make use of 1 GHz to 10 GHz.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ Not all antennas are resonant. For example, a parabolic dish works well for any wavelength that is significantly shorter than its diameter. \$\endgroup\$
    – Dave Tweed
    Commented Dec 19, 2016 at 16:09
  • \$\begingroup\$ @DaveTweed that's absolutely true, but the bandwidth of the feed is typically limited; classical solutions to that problem are tapered waveguides, that, to little surprise, work similarly to things like a Vivaldi antenna in transforming free-space Z to waveguide Z \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 19, 2016 at 16:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.