0
\$\begingroup\$

I have been trying to design a state variable filter based on a block diagram provided. The transfer function which I have is of the form:

$$\frac{K_1K_2}{s^2 + K_1s + K_1K_2}$$

I need to obtain and derive expressions for the natural frequency and quality factor of the state variable filter in terms of \$K_1\$ and \$K_2\$. In order to do so I need to compare my T.F with a 2nd order normalized T.F for state variable filters. Below is the T.F I am comparing with from this website.

$$\frac{V_{\text{out}}}{V_{\text{in}}} = \frac{A_o\left(\frac{f}{f_o}\right)}{\left[1 + 2\zeta\frac{f}{f_o} + \left(\frac{f}{f_o}\right)^2\right]}$$

I am getting confused since the 2nd order normalized T.F does not have an \$s^2\$ term.

For the natural frequency I have got:

$$\omega_n\text{ or }\frac{f}{f_o} = \sqrt{K_1K_2}$$

and for the quality factor:

$$2\zeta\omega_n = K_1s$$ $$\zeta = \frac{K_1s}{2\sqrt{K_1K_2}}$$

My question is: Am I comparing to the right transfer function since it does not have s squared terms? If so have I proceeded correctly? If not, are there any tips on what I could do to derive the above expressions correctly?

\$\endgroup\$
5
  • \$\begingroup\$ Your TF equation is correct, the website is wrong, all the 's' variables are missing. Also \$2\zeta \omega_n=K_1\$; 's' is the Laplace variable and doesn't have a numerical value in this context - it's the coefficient of s that you need. \$\endgroup\$
    – Chu
    Jan 7, 2018 at 13:36
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Chu thanks for your comment, so I guess the explanation given below is indeed correct. \$\endgroup\$
    – rrz0
    Jan 7, 2018 at 13:42
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Yes - the "tutorial" of the referenced website is totally wrong!! \$\endgroup\$
    – LvW
    Jan 9, 2018 at 12:02
  • \$\begingroup\$ @LvW, thanks, that was the main reason I was confused! \$\endgroup\$
    – rrz0
    Jan 9, 2018 at 13:39
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I left a written comment/correction at the site, but it was not considered. My recommendation: Do not rely on such tutorials. Instead, consult a good textbook (several good books are available online). \$\endgroup\$
    – LvW
    Jan 9, 2018 at 14:12

1 Answer 1

1
\$\begingroup\$

The transfer function of a second-order low pass filter is given by (reference):

$$H(s)=\frac{\omega_0^2}{s^2+2\zeta\omega_0 s+\omega_0^2}\tag{1}$$

where \$\omega_0\$ is the resonant frequency (in radians), and \$\zeta\$ is the damping ratio.

Comparing \$(1)\$ to your transfer function you get

$$\omega_0=\sqrt{K_1K_2}$$

and

$$\zeta=\frac12\sqrt{\frac{K_1}{K_2}}$$

\$\endgroup\$
16
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks for your answer. You mentioned that is the transfer function of a second-order low pass filter, however the transfer function in question here is that of a state variable filter. Does it still apply? \$\endgroup\$
    – rrz0
    Jan 7, 2018 at 13:17
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Rrz0: Yes, a state variable filter is just a certain structure to implement a filter characteristic. Your transfer function is a second-order low pass filter. \$\endgroup\$
    – Matt L.
    Jan 7, 2018 at 13:21
  • \$\begingroup\$ Can you please elaborate on how you got the value for the damping factor? I am getting (1/2) K1/sqrt(K1K2) \$\endgroup\$
    – rrz0
    Jan 8, 2018 at 10:36
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Rrz0: ... which is the same as the one I got, because \$K_1/\sqrt{K_1}=\sqrt{K_1}\$ :) \$\endgroup\$
    – Matt L.
    Jan 8, 2018 at 11:02
  • \$\begingroup\$ The frequency wo is not the "resonant" frequency but the so called "pole frequency". At this frequency the phase shift is -90deg. In contrast, "resonance" is defined for a frequency dependenet system at the point where the phase sift is zero. \$\endgroup\$
    – LvW
    Jan 9, 2018 at 8:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.