4
\$\begingroup\$

I like to restore vintage motorcycles, which commonly use 6V electrics.

The vintage bikes use a 6V dynamo or generator to produce DC which is then regulated to a constant 6V.

The current method in a vehicle, or on a motorbike, uses AC produced by an alternator which is then rectified and regulated

The older style mechanical hybrid regulator on a dynamo or generator system works by switching the field coil off and on which changes the strength of the magnetic field produced by the same. This regulates the amount of voltage generated by the dynamo part of the generator.

This is also done electronically by various solid state devices, including the DVR2 and the Boyer Bransden regulator. Rather than just purchase one of these already available solid state regulators I'd like to have a try at constructing my own.

Here are the basic specifications that I am aiming for:

  • Wattage: 60 Watt (maximum wattage of lighting)
  • Voltage: 5.7V (This is to charge 2 x 2.85V 3000F capacitors).
  • Amperage: Approximately 8A
  • Size: To fit inside the original regulator case, which is approximately 60mm x 25mm (2.5" x 1")

The regulator will charge two 2.85V 3000F capacitors, giving 1500F at 5.7V in series instead of the original 6V battery.

I have tried super caps on the bench with a LED headlight globe and it seems to last a long time on a single charge of the capacitors. The only significant current draw is from the 6V horn which (hopefully) will be seldom used.

The standard connections on a DC generator regulator are as follows:

  • F: Field winding
  • A: Ammeter (regulated output)
  • D: Dynamo
  • E: Earth

There it is, my knowledge of circuit design is untested, but I have had a bit of experience with electronics, I can use a multi-meter, and know about PN junctions. I can solder and make a PCB.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. \$\endgroup\$
    – Community Bot
    Commented Nov 5, 2021 at 23:20

2 Answers 2

2
\$\begingroup\$

First, refer to the Miller charging system diagram, here: https://dunhackin.com/index.php/velocette-documents/mac-manuals/28-rigid-frame-mac-service-manual/310-miller-lighting-set

enter image description here

Let’s break down (so to speak) how the Miller regulator works.

At rest, the regulator contacts connect the +D to field (solenoid is ‘up’).

When the engine is started and at low RPM (idle, say):

  • field coil gets its current from the armature through both the load resistor (about 7 ohms) and the regulator. The field current and field flux increase.
  • as the the voltage increases to the setpoint, the regulator solenoid opens the upper D+ contact. This decreases the field current to only that provided by the resistor.

So at low RPM the solenoid will cycle field between D+ and open. This will regulate to a low-limit voltage.

Now increase the RPM:

  • a further increase in voltage pulls the solenoid down more and closes lower contact, shorting out the field coil through GND. The field flux and current decrease.
  • as the voltage drops again, the solenoid de-energizes and the contacts open.

So at high RPM the solenoid cycles the field coil between GND (short) and the resistor. This will regulate to a high-limit voltage.

Either way, the regulator solenoid is 'buzzing' back and forth, chopping the field coil drive to maintain the voltage by setting an average field flux.

Finally, the battery overcurrent / undervoltage cut-out isn't part of the regulator; those are done inside the generator itself. This is a bit different than the normal old-school car ones that do all three (that includes the Bosch VW one.)


At any rate, seems like it could be possible to make an electronic version that watches the voltage and has that same low-limit / high-limit behavior.

Here's an initial try at doing just that (simulate it here):

enter image description here

The output voltage is compared to a reference (3.3V zener) with two comparators, which drive two big TO-220 FETs. Using two comparators allows adding a 'dead band' between the two trip points, modeling how the solenoid would behave, and also prevents turning on both FETs at the same time. There's some hysteresis (snap-action) provided on the comparators to reject noise.

The sim has a voltage slider so you can see how it behaves in response to the dynamo voltage. In the sim it’s set to regulate between 5.8 and 6.4V with about a 200 mV dead-band between the two. This is tighter than what the mechanical regulator did, and at a lower voltage limit (the Miller regulator is set for between 7.5~7.9V). You can adjust the regulator by modifying the resistor values to change the trip points.


Here's an improved version that fixes a start-up issue and uses lead-acid battery voltages so that the dynamo's cut-out can work (simulate it here):

enter image description here

This is set for lead-acid battery thresholds (7.2V nominal charge, 7.7 max), and adds an undervoltage lockout that forces the upper FET on and the lower one off until the voltage is high enough for the comparators to work. The comparator thresholds are set independently here so they're easier to adjust if needed. PNP transistor is 2N3906 or similar.

Were you to construct this, all the components are through-hole and easily solderable. I do recommend mounting the FETs to a heatsink, and that everything be made robust enough to stand up to vibration and heat. Consider potting the whole thing in RTV silicone for example.

Finally, the Supercap stack should be increased to 3 to have more margin for generator ripple and noise. I’d also consider blocking the generator-to-battery path with a diode, just to be safe.


If the comparator still has startup issues at low voltage, here's a design that uses only discrete parts (simulate it here):

enter image description here

This setup uses a 5.6V Zener and silicon diodes to set two trip points: 6.6V (Zener + diode) for charge and and 7.2V (Zener + 2 diodes) for high-limit. The voltage should stabilize between those two, being high enough for the cut-out to close without overcharging the battery. It's a bit kinder to the lead-acid battery than the Miller regulator, which set a max float charge of 7.5~7.9V.

Unlike the comparator version, this isn't resistor adjustable nor does it have hysteresis. You can adjust the trip points by adding additional diodes in series (each one will add 0.6V to the trip point) or using a different Zener.

I show the PNP transistors as 2N3906; they can be any common switching type.

\$\endgroup\$
26
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Higher current rating is better (lower Rds(on)), but you also want to check the gate-source voltage threshold. Since you’re working with only 6-7V, choose one that has a threshold of 2.5V or less. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 12, 2021 at 23:45
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Should be ok. Has a gate-source voltage of about 3V. The main concern is that this threshold be low enough that can be turned on with a low enough drain-source resistance that it won’t shed power. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 13, 2021 at 12:57
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ These MOSFETs have source and substrate connected together, inside the device. There’s also what’s called a body diode that is formed by the connection. You need not be concerned with these details at this point. Connect n-FET source to GND and p-FET source to the dynamo +. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 14, 2021 at 16:22
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ No, it’s the second from left. Look at the data sheet. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 14, 2021 at 21:36
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Come to think of it, add a capacitor (0.1uF) across the IC power connections too. That will catch any spike noise coming from the dynamo brushes. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 16, 2021 at 1:26
-1
\$\begingroup\$

I have done this a few times when the auto sparky could not get a replacement .It is best to sense batt volts and charging current cutting the field when either is too high .This was easy with zeners and transistors because the feild current is much lower than the armature current .Do use a freewheel diode to prevent inductive kick killing your circuit .Doing the cutout is more tricky .I have used a parallel pack of low dropdiodes with a small heatsink .Have fun .

\$\endgroup\$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.