1
\$\begingroup\$

Product Description

The device is a soil moisture sensing and analysis device that uses capacitance sensing technology to help manage soil moisture in your garden. One probe set at the bottom of the device and a second probe set just under the soil line, allow the device to measure soil moisture across the full vertical profile of the soil. Analysis of the data determines if the soil is over-saturated, optimally-saturated, wilting, or dry.

Green, yellow and red, instantly recognized symbols for good, bad and in-between serve as the interface of the device. These colors are used to indicate four discrete levels of soil moisture, and a low battery warning. The device is powered by three 4.5 V battery packs for a total of 13.5 V, which will (when the development board is replaced with its Microchip) power the device for the entire growing season.

Schematic Comments

  • The dashed lines indicate shielded cable.
  • Any and all other comments on the schematic.

enter image description here

Sensor Design

Capacitive sensing is a technology, based on capacitive coupling, that can detect and measure anything that is conductive or has a dielectric constant different from air. Dielectric sensors measure the charge-storing capacity of the soil. This charge-storage approach is much more effective than a resistance approach. The ideal dielectric sensor electrical circuit is one that simply acts to polarize water molecules between two electrodes.

The parallel fingers (GND-sensor) topology works under the principle of fringing capacitance. High sensitivity along the z-axis of the sensors enables this topology to be implemented in liquid level sensing applications. The electric field lines are more dominant near the edges between the sensor and ground plates. The sensitivity of the sensors increases as sensor size increases (non-linearly). A shield on the backside of the main sensor and GND electrode provides directivity towards the soil.

enter image description here

enter image description here

Multiple sensor and ground electrodes can be alternated to have a central ground or sensor symmetry, as shown in Figure 6-3. A central ground is required for a wide directivity along the width of the electrodes and gives the widest response. A central sensor electrode is required for high directivity along the width of the electrodes and provides the sharpest response. The comb configuration, as shown in Figure 6-4, is comprised of both of these variants and very effective for wide and high directivity.

Spin the Comb Design Around a Cylinder

This is my spin on the comb configuration. what I have to accomplish, with your help, is the validation of the sensor design and form.

enter image description here

enter image description here

enter image description here

Starting with the equation for capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor:

$$C=\frac{\varepsilon_r\times \varepsilon_0 \times A}{d}$$

Where:

  • \$A\$ is the area of the two plates (in meters)
  • \$\varepsilon_r\$ is the dielectric constant of the material between the plates (cultivated soil is 15)
  • \$\varepsilon_0\$ is the permittivity of free space (8.85 x 10-12 F/m)
  • \$d\$ is the separation between the plates (in meters)

Distance is the most obvious factor that needs to be reworked for my application. Given my cylindrical parallel fingers topology, how can I calculate capacitance?

Datasheets

Voltage Regulator
Voltage Reference
Development Board
Capacitance to Digital Converter
Tri-Color LED

References

Basics of Capacitive Sensing and Applications
Common Inductive and Capacitive Sensing Applications

\$\endgroup\$
21
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ The parallel plate capacitor formula explicitly ignores fringing fields. Your design, if I understand correctly, relies entirely on fringing fields. So it's a rather poor fit. This could be done with FEA accurately or do as e.d. suggests and make a mock-up. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 6, 2023 at 5:28
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ As for the rest of the design: Three sets of three AAA's will yield 13.5V, not 14.5V. The resistor set used for what is likely the low battery check does not require such low value resistors or such accuracy, this just wastes battery power. That coupled with a switcher supply and an Arduino board will likely make for a shortened growing season, or for two or more replacements of all 9 batteries. With only 5 I/O lines an Arduino is a lot of over-kill for a simple system, a single 8 pin processor of the same family would easily accomplish the same and at a much lower power usage. \$\endgroup\$
    – Nedd
    Commented Mar 6, 2023 at 16:37
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @TimCerka it seems like youre trying to power your arduino with a voltage reference, this will not work. Voltage references are not used to power devices, they are used - as the name suggests - e.g. in opamp circuits where you need an exact reference. If youre trying to remove the switching noise from the buck converter you need a linear regulator \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 8, 2023 at 7:21
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ You know that the cost of all those batteries will be dominate the cost of the overall system. Why use so many? Why create a high voltage when the whole thing could work on a much lower voltage \$\endgroup\$
    – user69795
    Commented Mar 13, 2023 at 22:34
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @TimCerka Are you still looking for a review of your schematics? The current version in the OP is still very sketchy and a lot of the suggestion above have not been implemented. For instance, cascading a switching regulator with a linear regulator to generate a 5V source off 13.5V is not necessary and will lead to lower voltage than you expect (5V minus the LDO dropout voltage). The suggestion of reducing the number of batteries is a must in my opinion too, or parallelization for longer runtime. \$\endgroup\$
    – eeintech
    Commented Mar 14, 2023 at 16:17

1 Answer 1

0
\$\begingroup\$

I have to give the answer to @user69795, @eeintech and @datenheim. The fact that my power supply was rubbish is the most important thing I learned from this post. I now believe that I can edit and have a workable circuit. I will be back with another version soon. Thanks you all for your input.

You know that the cost of all those batteries will be dominate the cost of the overall system. Why use so many? Why create a high voltage when the whole thing could work on a much lower voltage – user69795 Mar 13 at 22:34

Are you still looking for a review of your schematics? The current version in the OP is still very sketchy and a lot of the suggestion above have not been implemented. For instance, cascading a switching regulator with a linear regulator to generate a 5V source off 13.5V is not necessary and will lead to lower voltage than you expect (5V minus the LDO dropout voltage). The suggestion of reducing the number of batteries is a must in my opinion too, or parallelization for longer runtime. – eeintech Mar 14 at 16:17

At least the power supply is rubbish, as others said already. You did not include any hints so far. Improve your question, to make it more "inspiring" to hunt the bounty ;-) – datenheim Mar 14 at 21:41

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.