4
\$\begingroup\$

I have this vague sense that in the design of analog integrated circuits we tend to think of or do biasing by fixing the DC currents of amplifying stages as opposed to the DC voltages (as seemed to be the case when studying the biasing of discrete transistors). For instance, we do biasing using current mirrors rather than doing voltage division using resistors. Now I know and understand why resistors aren't really accessible to us in the integrated circuit context, but that doesn't seem to me to be an a priori (perhaps necessary and sufficient is more appropriate here) reason that we focus on biasing in terms of currents rather than voltages in the integrated circuit context.

  1. Is this sense accurate?
  2. If so, is there some (deep?) reason for this or is this just sort of an accident of how the analog integrated circuits trade developed?
\$\endgroup\$
6
  • \$\begingroup\$ As the last schematic in my answer here illustrates, very good discrete designs can be and should be based upon fixing the DC currents. It's just that IC designers can count on better matching and better thermal matching on an IC die. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 27 at 23:30
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you for that very helpful answer! @periblepsis \$\endgroup\$
    – EE18
    Commented Jan 27 at 23:57
  • \$\begingroup\$ There are examples of both current and voltage biasing (hand-waving a typical meaning in lieu of working definitions) in ICs; this doesn't seem a reasonable question. More reasonable would be, what applications are best suited to what kind of biasing. Does that make sense? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 28 at 4:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ That does definitely make sense! I guess I am just used to the standard presentation from textbooks where it seems like we think about currents, but then again perhaps I've not yet seen biasing in great depth and detail. @TimWilliams \$\endgroup\$
    – EE18
    Commented Jan 28 at 20:17
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I'm actually interested in the source of "resistors aren't accessible in the IC context". Where did you read that? \$\endgroup\$
    – Designalog
    Commented Feb 2 at 10:09

2 Answers 2

1
\$\begingroup\$

I'm not sure what you mean by "biasing by fixing the DC currents of amplifying stages as opposed to the DC voltages". Assuming we're talking about a common-emitter/source amplifier within a feedback loop (down to DC), you always fix the current and let the loop find the right base/gate voltages and currents (yes, even if they're nA or pA) to properly bias your amplifier stage at your desired collector/drain current.

(As an aside, one could "fix" the current with a collect/drain resistor, but then that would incur in bias errors as long your design specs permits it)

If, on the other hand, you're referring to the observation that current mirrors might be more ubiquitous in IC designs while resistive voltage dividers are seen more in discrete designs, then the reason for this choice is matching.

In the picture below, we have implemented a voltage source with a diode-connected transistor Q2 and current source (enclosed in the dashed box). If the surroundings and external conditions change (process variations, temperature, etc), this circuit will keep adapting its base voltage such that the current is 1mA (or close to it). Since Q1 is equal to Q2 in an integrated circuit (provided there's a proper IC layout), we can closely approximate the behavior of Q1 with Q2, so we expect that Q1 will have the same current flowing through it as Q2, because they have the same size and physical characteristics (there's the collector voltage difference which might induce a collector current error, of course, but that's beside the point).

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

If Q2 and I1 were replaced by a resistive divider, then we will not have this tracking behavior and we'd probably have more errors in the set current.

Finally, it is not true that resistors are not accessible in IC technologies. We use them, all the way from a few ohms to a few Mohms, if not more. The only reason they're not used that often is due to area. Of course, no one will accept that you build a textbook degenerated common-emitter amplifier in an IC because you could design something a lot smaller with much more quality, i.e. a feedback amplifier with larger loop gain and smaller area.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ This answer was fantastically helpful, thank you so much. Yes, in many ways I think you've precisely captured what I'm wondering about: why the preponderance of current mirrors in biasing. It seems the answer is captured in your line that "If Q2 and I1 were replaced by a resistive divider, then we will not have this tracking behavior and we'd probably have more errors in the set current", right? \$\endgroup\$
    – EE18
    Commented Jan 30 at 23:16
  • \$\begingroup\$ @EE18 yes, I'd say so. In IC design lots of indirect feedback and feedforward arrangements work really well due to matching. However, it's not like it's impossible to do this in discrete designs because matched transistor arrays are available commercially, but I guess it's just easier to do so in IC design. \$\endgroup\$
    – Designalog
    Commented Jan 31 at 6:05
3
\$\begingroup\$

Transistor biasing techniques

From the side of the base (by voltage)

It is widely used in single-ended AC amplifiers. In this configuration, a biasing voltage divider with a relatively high output resistance is connected to the transistor base. The AC input signal is applied through a coupling capacitor to the base so it is added to the bias voltage.

Actually, two voltage sources - DC biasing and AC input, are connected in parallel. The former is imperfect (with some internal resistance), the latter is perfect (with very low impedance) so its voltage dominates.

A problem of this biasing technique is that the voltage divider shunts the input of the CE transistor amplifier. Another, even more fundamental problem is that a DC voltage source (not containing an internal capacitor) cannot be connected directly to the amplifier input because it will suppress the divider bias voltage and impose its voltage. Therefore, it is desirable to bias the transistor from the side of the emitter.

From the side of the emitter (by current)

But we cannot bias the transistor from the emitter side with a voltage because in some cases the emitter voltage must vary; so in these cases we would have to bias it through current. But in a single-ended stage this is not possible because the emitter voltage will not be fixed but will follow the base voltage, and the collector current will not change.

For this purpose, the differential stage was invented where a second transistor (emitter follower) is connected "in parallel" to the first (i.e. their emitters are joined). In this configuration, a current source and two “voltage sources" are connected in parallel, and act as follows:

Common mode: When the two input voltages simultaneously vary in the same direction, the emitter voltage follows them but the current source passes a constant bias current through the emitters. The collector currents and the collector output voltage do not change.

Note that the current source cannot directly draw bias current from the emitters; it only "indicates" that it wants to do so by starting to "pull down" the emitter. The transistor "senses" the voltage drop, and according to the negative feedback mechanism, begins to "pull up" the emitter to restore the voltage. However, this requires a corresponding base current, the path of which must be closed through something - the input voltage source which must be able to pass DC.

Differential mode: When the two input voltages simultaneously vary but in opposite directions, the emitter voltage stays constant (virtual ground). The collector currents and the collector output voltage vigorously change.

CircuitLab experiments

Let’s now explore these biasing techniques by the help of CircuitLab.

No biasing

The problem with the transistor is that it operates in a very small input voltage range (about 200 mV). We can explore it by "sweeping" Vin (run the CircuitLab DC Sweep Simulation).

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

So, when the input voltage changes from -1 V to 1 V, the transistor properly works (amplifies) only in the region from 600 mV to 800 mV.

STEP 1

Therefore, we need to "lift" the input signal applied to the base-emitter junction and limit its variations within 200 mV. We can do it in two ways - by adding the bias voltage to the base or by subtracting it from the emitter.

Biasing from the base side

In series: The obvious way to sum the voltages of the two sources is to connect them in series. We can connect them in two ways, but always one of the two sources is "floating", which creates inconvenience.

Grounded bias source, floating input source: It can be used with floating voltage sources such as microphones, sensors, etc.

schematic

simulate this circuit

Grounded input source, floating bias source: This configuration is used in AC amplifiers where the coupling capacitors act as floating Vbias sources.

schematic

simulate this circuit

As you can see, the amplifier transfer curve is symmetrically located with respect to the zero voltage point.

STEP 2.1.2

In parallel: Let's try this option as well, even though it seems impossible.

Conceptual circuit: The simulator does not allow "ideal" voltage sources to be connected in parallel; so let's set some very small resistance (1 Ω) to one of the two sources (Vbias).

schematic

simulate this circuit

As you can see, Vin dominates over Vbias, and actually there is no biasing.

STEP 2.2.1

Voltage divider: So Vin should be connected through another resistor Rin to the base. Vbias can be implemented by an R1-R2 voltage divider. Thus the three resistors form a resistor summer with weighted inputs that sums Vin and Vbias.

schematic

simulate this circuit

The disadvantage of this resistor coupling is that the input voltage is attenuated, and the gain is decreased (the transfer curve is steeper).

STEP 2.2.2

Coupling capacitor: There is no such a problem if Vin is connected through a charged capacitor. For convenience, we can simulate it in a DC manner by a "rechargeable battery" without worrying about time and frequency). Note that actually the coupling capacitor is connected in series to Vin like in the Schematic 2.1.2 above.

schematic

simulate this circuit

The transfer curve is the same as in the Schematic 2.1.1.

STEP 2.2.3

Biasing from the emitter side

By voltage: We can place Vin and Vbias on either side of the base-emitter junction; so they are effectively connected in series as in the Schematic 2.1.2 above. An advantage of this connection is that both voltage sources are grounded.

schematic

simulate this circuit

Note that the gain has increased because there is no negative feedback (resistor) in the emitter.

STEP 3.1

So the emitter will be at permanently fixed voltage Vbias which is not always desired. For example, in a differential amplifier, we want in some cases (single-ended and differential mode) the emitter to be "fixed" and in others (common mode) to be "moving".

By current: Then let's try to bias the transistor by injecting a bias current into the emitter. Thus the emitter will be "movable" (Vin can easily change its voltage).

schematic

simulate this circuit

The emitter voltage changes, but the emitter current and, accordingly, the collector current and the voltage drop across Rc does not change... so there is no gain.

STEP 3.2

Through one or the other: But how to do so to switch the mode? And here comes the ingenious "long-tailed pair" idea - to connect another voltage source Vin2' in parallel to the other voltage source Vin1 and the current source Ibias.

Vin2' = const (single-ended amplifier). The emitter is "immovable"...

schematic

simulate this circuit

... and the gain is maximum.

STEP 3.3.1

Vin2' = Vin1 (no amplifier). The emitter is "movable" (the behavioral voltage source Vin2' follows Vin1 with 0.642 V lower voltage)...

schematic

simulate this circuit

... and the gain is minimum.

STEP 3.3.2

In the practical circuit this means to connect a second transistor "in parallel" to the first by joining their emitters. Thus we come to the famous "long-tailed pair".

schematic

simulate this circuit

Conclusions

The main reasons for transistor differential amplifier stages to be biased by injecting a current into the emitters are:

  • The emitter voltage must be able to follow the common-mode input voltages when they vary widely.

  • The transistor inputs must not be shunted by bias circuits to have a high input resistance.

  • The base bias currents flow through the input voltage sources that must be able to pass the currents through themselves.

\$\endgroup\$
10
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Thank you for this answer! I'm afraid I don't completely follow but I will give it another read later today. If it's at all possible, would you be able to include a couple diagrams? I think I struggled following without it, but no worries if not as I know they must take a great deal of time. \$\endgroup\$
    – EE18
    Commented Jan 28 at 20:47
  • \$\begingroup\$ @EE18, Am I to think that you like my CircuitLab "comics" and can't live without them anymore? :-) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 28 at 20:52
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ You are correct, I didn't realize how much I enjoyed them! \$\endgroup\$
    – EE18
    Commented Jan 28 at 22:00
  • \$\begingroup\$ There is some problem uploading the images because I keep getting the message "failed to upload the schematic image". I hope it is temporary. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 30 at 16:49
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ All done reading, and I think I will need to take some time to digest and read again. I followed the early parts but didn't quite understand what the differential pair had to do with the more general discussion of how one thinks about current biasing...but perhaps on a second read I will follow! \$\endgroup\$
    – EE18
    Commented Jan 30 at 22:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.