For the same price chip, which will be more accurate to measure rotational acceleration: a gyroscope, or an accelerometer 10cm away from the pivot point?

  • \$\begingroup\$ Do you want to integrate the rotational acceleration to compute the orientation, or just keep it as is? \$\endgroup\$ Jun 15 '14 at 17:02
  • \$\begingroup\$ @VladimirCravero Keep it as is. I would differentiate the orientation to get the rotational acceleration. \$\endgroup\$
    – Dan
    Jun 15 '14 at 17:53
  • \$\begingroup\$ a gyroscope would give you an output in \$\frac{\text{rad}}{s}\$, you can differentiate it to get \$\frac{\text{rad}}{s^2}\$, is that right? \$\endgroup\$ Jun 15 '14 at 20:00
  • \$\begingroup\$ @VladimirCravero Correct. \$\endgroup\$
    – Dan
    Jun 15 '14 at 23:44

Gyroscope will be more accurate, but is highly subjet to drift, which is the reason why they are often used with an accelerometer and even sometimes with a compass.

Accelerometer alone will be slow.

I would suggest you watch this conference : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7JQ7Rpwn2k

  • \$\begingroup\$ So, the impression I'm getting is to use both and combine the data, is that correct? \$\endgroup\$
    – Dan
    Jun 15 '14 at 19:17
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes, I think it's the best thing to do. Nowadays, you can find ship including compass, accelerometer and gyroscope for a price comparable to a gyroscope alone. \$\endgroup\$
    – servabat
    Jun 15 '14 at 20:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.