6
\$\begingroup\$

I'm new to this field hence this weird question. Why would we need to ground an AC source? Why wouldn't it be enough to have just one pole to get an AC current going? I understand why it wouldn't work in DC case where current is flowing in one direction. However, in case of AC source where the current is not flowing anywhere but rather just oscillating back and forth it's not that clear to me why connecting load to only one pole wouldn't work?

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Short answer: Kirchoff's Voltage and Current Laws must be satisfied for any instant in time. \$\endgroup\$ – Matt Young Jun 21 '14 at 1:50
  • \$\begingroup\$ ^ Meaning the sum of potentials about any closed path is equal to zero. See the wiki. Without a ground connection (in the general sense) there is no closed path. \$\endgroup\$ – sherrellbc Jun 21 '14 at 2:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ To be somewhat pedantic, you don't need to ground an AC circuit, but you do need to have a complete circuit for current to flow (even with AC, where the current flows back-and-forth) \$\endgroup\$ – Peter Bennett Jun 21 '14 at 6:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ Other questions that may be of interest: Relationship between positive, negative, neutral and ground in AC and DC; Why are some AC outlets and plugs polarized? \$\endgroup\$ – JYelton Jun 21 '14 at 7:16
10
\$\begingroup\$

Electric circuits are always a complete path, which is the very definition of circuit. In a DC circuit, current flows from one pole to another in a constant, direct manner. In an AC circuit, current also flows from one pole to another, but it changes voltage and direction many times per second. (With mains power, this is 50 or 60 times per second, depending on where you live.)

It's not correct to say that with an AC source "current is not flowing anywhere but rather just oscillating back and forth." Current is flowing, but it is changing direction rapidly.

Let's take a moment and do an analogy - mind you, not a great analogy, but one I think that may help. Take a band saw for example. There is a metal blade with teeth that is essentially a ring (a band, which is where the tool gets its name) wrapped around two drums. When you turn on the saw, the blade moves in one direction, and you pass material into the blade to cut. You can think of the band as direct current, always moving in one direction, making a complete circuit.

If you think of a hand saw, where you oscillate the blade back and forth, the analogy falls apart, because there is not a complete circuit. In order for electric current to flow, there must be a complete circuit. It may be that this sort of idea is what has confused you with regard to alternating current. Because it is possible to move a saw blade by only acting on it from one side, you might assume a similar effect could be achieved with electric current.

Instead, imagine that the blade must always be continuous, thus we're back to the band saw. This time, let's say the tool moves the blade up and down (like a jig saw) and the teeth on the blade are modified to cut in both directions. You can still pass material into the blade to cut, but you're always cutting with the same section of blade, assuming that the movement in each direction is the same. Each time the blade moves up, it has to stop and reverse direction. The same is true with the downward cut. Think of these momentary stops as the point at which the AC voltage source is at 0 volts (the zero crossing).

Unlike a battery, an AC voltage source is always changing the voltage potential of the two poles, in an equal and opposite manner. When one pole is at a positive voltage, the other pole (with respect to the first) is at a negative voltage. As the voltage of one pole changes, the other is mirroring it. Current flows from one to the other, always.

Now about that ground thing... When you consider an AC source and a load, you basically have two connections. One pole to one side of a load, and the other pole to the other side of the load. Neither pole is really ground, because they're both just opposite sides of the AC source. You can call one of them ground, but realize that doing so is just a reference. If you decide that pole "B" is "ground" then you're essentially saying all voltage measurements should be with respect to that pole. If you were to measure any part of the circuit with a voltmeter, you would connect the black probe to the wire you've labeled as "ground" and all readings would be based on that as a reference.

In most household electrical circuits and appliances, ground is actually a third wire. The two poles I mentioned earlier are called "hot" and "neutral" (black and white wires in the US), and "ground" is the bare copper wire (or often green). The purpose for this ground is safety. A simple appliance might have a metal enclosure, which is connected to ground. Hot and neutral enter the appliance to power it. If something were to go wrong, like a wire came loose inside, if the chassis were not grounded, touching it could result in an electric shock. Having the chassis grounded instead diverts current back to Earth ground, usually in a very abrupt manner, such that the circuit breaker trips and power is cut off.

Mind you, this is a simplified explanation, but I hope it helps you understand the basic concept of AC and to differentiate between what constitutes the wires of the circuit and ground both as a concept and a physical connection.

For more in-depth information about AC, check out this article at allaboutcircuits.com.

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

Think of AC as back and forth direct current. During the time it is flowing in one direction it needs a "place" to go. That "place" is the completion of the circuit, or the neutral.

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

You actually have more than one question, so we need to engage them in individually.

Do we need to ground the AC source No - You can have just one pole to work, under special conditions(High Frequency cause 60Hz would take a long time) where you collect it, reuse it...(e.g., High Frequency/High Voltage lead of a neon sign transformer, can be directly connected to a "Y" of two fast diodes of opposite direction and placing a capacitor between them. This is an AV plug, and the capacitor will build voltage)

This was done with no return of the AC lead of the neon sign transformer. Single wire oscillating as you say.

Driving a load is a different matter because to have current flow you must have the load between two different potentials, one higher and one lower. Thus ground is a relative state, for AC. That ground could be air, that's why I use the term energy ambience for a background state. I'm sure people have question marks around their craniums about now. So let me give an example of air ground: Take a Tesla coil and make it transmit through the Earth(BTW this is possible) the earth is acting as a conductor, and the Tesla receiver is connected to the Earth, and then the Tesla coil is air grounded to the top load. The Earth is not ground in this example.

Energy seeks the path of ambience(background state of relative ground). So regardless of which side of the polarity hill it rolls, water will flow on both sides, as long as there is more potential (a hill or in electricity we call that voltage).

We have to divorce our thinking of ground in terms of the 2 dimensional sine wave representation where 0 volts is ground. It's just a reference for the signal, otherwise the negative cycle wouldn't need to seek ambience.

You have to consider the open circuit systems, because most will only retain answers in closed circuits, but that is rarely how the universe works. And you start wondering how inductive and capacitive coupling works if there is no physical wires touching to close circuits.

It's best to think in general terms that when you have any voltage, it will seek a lower potential.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ I've never seen "ambiance" used in relation to electric circuits. I have no idea which concept you are trying to convey here. \$\endgroup\$ – pipe May 8 '18 at 12:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you for catching that, my spell check kept pushing it there, I know it's not used but I can't seem to find the concept of background state of no potential. And seeking ground is not what I am really after. Maybe relative ground? \$\endgroup\$ – XR IX May 8 '18 at 13:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.