3
\$\begingroup\$

I've got a small DC brushless motor for which I would like to set a current limiting circuit as a protection against over-current.

I thought I could pull it off with a simple fuse (or those current limiting fuse-like chips) but I can't. The fuse would only work to protect against short circuits because I want to set my limit just 20% (max!) above the nominal current draw of the motor.

I didn't design the motor electronics, and my competence in electronics is not great but I was basically wondering if I could use a circuit similar to those:

Schematic Schematic
(source: wikimedia.org)

and if so how I would select the correct components (like transistors and resistors)?

The nominal current draw for the motor is 1.5A. I'd like the circuit to cut the power off when the current is 1.8A or more.

The reason I need something like this is because the load on the motor can vary greatly and would sometimes bring the current draw to 1.8A and more (which I consider unsafe - it's very subjective but that's what I'd like to do...)

Any idea?

edit: clarification: I want to switch power off when the current exceeds a certain value, which has to be about 20% max higher than the nominal power draw of my motor.

edit: how about that second schematic?

\$\endgroup\$
10
  • \$\begingroup\$ You're combining two concepts here that aren't the same thing. Sounds like you want something that will act like a breaker if the current gets too high. But you use "current limiter" in your question title. A current limiter is typically a circuit that reduces the voltage as necessary to prevent the current from going above a preset value. In other words, it doesn't cut off the current, it just clamps it. Which one do you want? \$\endgroup\$
    – Dan Laks
    Commented Jul 29, 2014 at 21:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ Tried a 1.1A PTC yet? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 29, 2014 at 21:39
  • \$\begingroup\$ Hi Dan, you're correct. I want to cut off power all together when the current exceeds a certain value. is it possible to do this without a fuse or similar chip? I can't afford to choose a fuse with a value too close to my nominal current draw as it could over time (say days of operation) get it to trigger. I have playing with PTC's of different values, and to be able NOT TO trigger I need a value that is way higher than my nominal current, which will only be efficient against shorts. I've seen PTC's triggers after 8 hours of test. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 29, 2014 at 21:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ Maybe you need a shunt, relay, and MCU then. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 29, 2014 at 22:12
  • \$\begingroup\$ what about the second schematic, also found on the same wikipedia page.. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 29, 2014 at 22:30

1 Answer 1

4
\$\begingroup\$

Your first circuit appears to be a current limiter. If the resistor values are properly chosen, the circuit will clamp the collector current (the current through the transistor and thus your load) at some value. It will not cut power.

The second circuit image you posted is not a complete circuit. The box labelled "Drive Circuit" represents some logic block that you would have to design. It takes feedback and directly turns power on and off to the load. That could be done any number of ways.

If you want something that acts more like a fuse that can be easily reset, something like a latching relay in series with the load could work. I'd probably use a comparator to trigger the relay when the voltage across a shunt resistor went above a threshold.

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

The relay is a latching type. Rshunt is an appropriately chosen shunt resistor. R1 and R2 are chosen such that they divide to the voltage that triggers the comparator when the current through the load is 1.5A or higher: Vtrigger = 1.5A * Rshunt = Vcc * R2/(R1+R2)

Here are some considerations:
1. Rshunt should be small so it does not steal too much power from the drive circuit.
2. This circuit assumes Vcc is a stable voltage source. If it's weak and changes voltage under load, the comparator circuit will not trigger correctly.
3. If you're driving a motor, there might be a temporary current surge on start up that exceeds 1.5A for a short period of time. If that's allowable, you may need to build a low-pass filter into the non-inverting input of the comparator.
4. If you choose a double-coil latching relay (not shown), you can rig a button up to the second coil to reset the relay after it triggers.
5. The coil of the relay may not be compatible with Vcc.

\$\endgroup\$
5
  • \$\begingroup\$ "Vcc" seems strange to use as notation here. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 30, 2014 at 19:59
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Ignacio - just staying consistent with the circuits in the OP's question. I had originally used a voltage source in CircuitLab. \$\endgroup\$
    – Dan Laks
    Commented Jul 30, 2014 at 20:18
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you very much Dan, it looks like it will do exactly what I need. My power source is a stable 12V DC PSU, voltage fluctuations do not exceed 2-3%. I am going to build this and use a pot to figure out the correct value for the resistor. a 5W 0.1 Ohm shunt should do the trick for Rshunt. Do you have any recommendation on the comparator I should use? thanks again! \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 30, 2014 at 21:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ Oh and I am awaiting a larger shunt to measure the inrush current of the motor on an oscilloscope. I suspect it'll be fine as it has PWM control and it features a nice/slow ramp in speed at startup. thanks again \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 30, 2014 at 22:00
  • \$\begingroup\$ No specific recommendation for a comparator. Just make sure its input offset voltage is much much smaller than the input signal from the shunt. Also, use high-precision resistors to make the divider. And make sure the Vgs of the MOSFET is compatible with the output of the comparator (i.e., when the comparator swings high, its voltage is high enough to turn on the MOSFET). \$\endgroup\$
    – Dan Laks
    Commented Jul 30, 2014 at 22:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.