1
\$\begingroup\$

Consider the equation

$$ E = -L\,\dfrac{di}{dt} $$

The negative sign in the above equation indicates that the induced emf opposes the battery's emf.

If we're talking about a purely inductive circuit, the induced emf is equal and opposite to applied emf. Isn't it just like two identical batteries in opposition?

If that's the case, how does the current flow?

The expression for inductive reactance and the relationship between current and voltage in an inductive circuit are derived from this equation which assumes that the circuit under consideration is purely inductive.

I always think that the current in an inductive circuit is only because of the resistance associated with the coil. If the value of resistance tends to zero, the induced emf becomes equal and opposite to applied emf resulting in no net current.

Am I right? Is there anything I'm missing here? Please explain me in detail. :)

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ What is di/dt for steady-state DC circuit? \$\endgroup\$ Sep 21 '14 at 3:04
2
\$\begingroup\$

If the value of resistance tends to zero, the induced emf becomes equal and opposite to applied emf resulting in no net current.

No, not remotely so. You're caught in the trap of thinking that an equal and opposite induced emf to the applied emf implies zero current but that does not logically follow.

What's required here is clarity of thought.

Carefully consider the consequences of the following conditions for an ideal inductor:

  • there is an emf, proportional to the rate of change of current through, that tends to oppose the change in current
  • there is an applied voltage that is precisely opposite the emf

Logically, if the above hold (which they must for an ideal inductor), the rate of change of current through the inductor is proportional to the applied voltage across.

If the voltage across an ideal inductor is a constant, non-zero value, it is illogical to conclude that the current is zero. The logical conclusion is that the rate of change of current is constant.

If the inductor current were constantly zero, the induced emf would be zero but that would be inconsistent with a non-zero applied voltage since it would imply 'infinite' current for an inductor with vanishing resistance.

Put another way, if the current is to be finite for a non-zero applied voltage across, there must be an emf precisely opposite the applied voltage and that implies a non-zero rate of change of current.

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

If you attach a fixed source of voltage V across an inductor L, the current increases at a rate di/dt = L/V.

If there is resistance, it levels off asymptotically towards V/R. If there is no resistance, it increases (for fixed V) linearly until something breaks.

This is how superconducting coils are charged. A source is applied (via a heat switch) and the current increases linearly to the final desired current. The final current is limited by the supply and by the critical current of the superconducting coil.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.