Why does a microwave oven with metal (?) walls work fine, but if I (theoretically) put a metal spoon in it, "bad things" may happen?

Maybe these internal walls are not conductive?

  • \$\begingroup\$ You are right, but all manufacturers warning not to operate the MWO without any "load" inside. Metal wall alone it is dangerous as any metallic "load" inside the MWO. \$\endgroup\$
    – GR Tech
    Oct 4, 2014 at 17:08
  • \$\begingroup\$ A SciShow video on the topic: youtube.com/watch?v=ZqAZz-JhvYA \$\endgroup\$ Oct 6, 2014 at 8:57

5 Answers 5


Metal in a microwave is really not a big problem. The walls of every microwave ever made are metal, the window contains metal mesh, mine has a metal shelf and a metal base for the turntable.

The general guideline of "do not put metal objects into a microwave" does make sense - metal in the oven has to have a certain shape, size, alloy, distance from other pieces etc. or it will really do unpleasant things like arc and get dangerously hot. The rules are complex and as the average microwave oven owner doesn't have a post-graduate degree in physics with at least a minor in high-energy radio it's just easier to say "no metal."

People who really do know better will also know that they can ignore the note on the box, but the lawyers can point to the note on the box after your attempt to home-sinter aluminum powder burns the kitchen down.

  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ A physicist friend of mine uses steel kitchen bowls in his family's microwave oven on a regular basis, and expressed surprise that I would express surprise. But that may be a matter of knowing the rules. \$\endgroup\$
    – keshlam
    Oct 4, 2014 at 23:50
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ "but the lawyers can point to the note on the box after your attempt to home-sinter aluminum powder burns the kitchen down." But if you know better, then wouldn't you also likely be smart enough to know that you would be unable to successfully sue the company for damages? \$\endgroup\$ Oct 5, 2014 at 10:24
  • 11
    \$\begingroup\$ No - people who try to home-sinter aluminum and fail are just the type to sue both the oven and aluminum suppliers. The ones that know the lawsuit would fail would not have caused the fire in the first place. \$\endgroup\$
    – paul
    Oct 5, 2014 at 23:59
  • \$\begingroup\$ @paul: I did not read it properly, apparently. \$\endgroup\$ Oct 6, 2014 at 13:03
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Hmm I never thought about that...Now where can I get myself a supply of inert gas... \$\endgroup\$
    – Aron
    Oct 8, 2014 at 10:44

The metal walls of the microwave oven reflect the microwave radiation.

A metal object in the middle of the microwave field can do several things. It could reflect the radiation like the walls do. That's bad if there is nothing else in the oven to eventually absorb the radiation. All that microwave power ultimately has to end up somewhere. It's better for the oven if it ends up heating your food. Even if there are absorbers in the field, the reflections will make the field uneven, creating hot spots and cold spots.

A metal object could absorb some of the radiation itself, depending on the impedance of the material at microwave frequencies. That would heat the metal object, which could possibly heat it higher than the temperature the floor of the oven is intended to handle.

Depending on the size and arrangement of metal objects, they can act as antennas and generate significant potential. I have seen small metal objects arc to each other.

All in all, your microwave oven is intended to heat water molecules. Any deviation from that will make it less efficient, and possibly cause problems to the oven, depending on how much expense was put into protecting itself. These are high volume consumer items, so I don't have much confidence that quality was a high design priority. They probably did the absolute minimum they felt was necessary.

  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ "It could reflect the radiation like the walls do. That's bad if there is nothing else in the oven to eventually absorb the radiation." - It just reads wrong, so amateurishly asked: If the radiation has to be absorbed, why isn't it a problem to turn on an empty microwave? \$\endgroup\$
    – Rev
    Oct 6, 2014 at 7:30
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ @Rev1.0 Are you sure it isn't a problem? The last I heard you aren't supposed to turn on an empty microwave. \$\endgroup\$
    – JohannesD
    Oct 6, 2014 at 8:23
  • \$\begingroup\$ @JohannesD: Ok, after reading some discussions on that topic, it seems there is something to it. Supposedly it can cause to heat up the metal walls, glass dish, front glass, and magnetron parts (potentially damaging the magnetron). Standing waves also seem to become an issue causing high-voltage arcing. Some people claim to run their "empty" microwaves for hours without problems, while other say that they notice odd things after several minutes. Some manufacturers seem to place a respective warning in the manual. \$\endgroup\$
    – Rev
    Oct 6, 2014 at 8:32

When they say "don't put metal objects in a microwave" what they really mean is "don't put the food in a metal container." Obviously the container will reflect the microwaves and the food won't cook.

Now here's the problem. If the energy is not going into the food, it has to go somewhere. In general you should not operate a microwave without food in it, and equally you should not operate a microwave with food in a metal container.

Someone I shared a kitchen with once tried to cook a burrito wrapped in aluminium foil in a microwave. The burrito was unable to absorb the energy as it was shielded inside a very effective Faraday cage.* As a result, the plastic lining of the microwave was the next thing around that could absorb the energy, and it melted. Despite the damage, the microwave remained functional.

It's certainly possible that a metal object could act as an antenna and generate sparks, but I wasn't present when the event happened, so I cannot say if there were any. I can say there was no localised charring as you might expect if there had been sparks.

If you are not familiar with the term Faraday cage, it is just a posh name for the (theoretically) perfect shielding an object gets from being fully surrounded by a conductor. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage


Metal in a microwave is not inherently a bad thing. As others have mentioned, metal alone in the microwave isn't very good as there is no load to absorb the energy. However, many microwaves do come with a metal rack, and if you examine the rack, it doesn't have any pointy edges which would be rather efficient arc sources. Other metal items especially alone can also be arc sources. However, many a manual for microwaves in their section on cooking and such, have suggestions for defrosting meat to put small pieces of aluminum foil on the corners of the package so that the corners don't get cooked during the defrost process. Now, you should try to make the foil as smooth as possible to avoid creating points for arcs to originate from, but even if it is a little crumbly it is okay due to the much larger load of the meat needing to be defrosted absorbing the vast majority of the energy.


Yes, it's all about avoiding standing waves and directing the energy usefully. The EM waves from the magnetron normally warm up the foodstufs they can reach and that loading keeps the energy density in the cavity down. If the EM cannot reach the food because of metallic packaging, the energy density throughout the coupled carity/waveguide/magnetron rises until the cavity losses and the energy dissipated in the waveguide and magnetron anode/cathode balance out the energy generated. This results in very high potentials at the various antinodes in the cavity, (which can cause arcing), and excessive heat generation in the magnetron, (which can reduce its lifetime/reliability).

All that power has to go somewhere:)


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.