I have a complex number s of the form s=[1/sqrt(NN\$_{t})] e^{j\phi_{k}}\$ S\$_{o}\$ is another complex number. It is given that |s-s\$ _{o}\$|<= \$\epsilon\$ where 0< \$\epsilon\$< 2

It is stated in the literature that this constrain can be written as $$ \phi_{k}=\arg s \in\left[\gamma , \gamma + \delta \right] $$ where \$ \gamma \$ and \$ \delta \$ are given by \$ \gamma \$ =arg S\$ _{o} \$ - arccos(1- \$\epsilon ^2/2)\$ and \$\delta \$ =2arccos(1- \$ \epsilon^2/2)\$ Can anyone explain how is that possible?

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I adjusted your display equation to try to make it say what I think you wanted to say. If I got it wrong, feel free to revert my edits. \$\endgroup\$ – The Photon Oct 8 '14 at 19:22

This is only possible if \$|s|=|s_0|=1\$. Squaring the original inequality gives


where \$\Delta\phi=\arg\{s\}-\arg\{s_0\}\$ is the phase difference between \$s\$ and \$s_0\$. If \$|s|=|s_0|=1\$ is satisfied we get from (1)


or, equivalently,


From this inequality it follows that


which is equivalent to the condition in your question.

  • \$\begingroup\$ I got the lower limit for \$ \phi _{k} \$ from your equation but I couldn't get upper limit \$\endgroup\$ – Aashish Sharma Oct 9 '14 at 4:22
  • \$\begingroup\$ The upper limit is just \$\arg\{s_0\}+\arccos(1-\epsilon^2)\$, and the lower limit is \$\arg\{s_0\}-\arccos(1-\epsilon^2)\$, so the difference between the two arguments is never greater than \$\arccos(1-\epsilon^2)\$. \$\endgroup\$ – Matt L. Oct 9 '14 at 7:18
  • \$\begingroup\$ Does it mean they have assumed maximum magnitude of arg{S \$ _{o}\$} is arccos(1- \$ \epsilon ^2/2)\$ \$\endgroup\$ – Aashish Sharma Oct 9 '14 at 9:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.