0
\$\begingroup\$

I have a question on basic electronics. I'm looking at a very simple CMOS RC Circuit around a Schmitt Inverter which creates square waves. Something like this.

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

Now the frequency of the square waves is a function of the value 1/(R1*C1). Hence the frequency is inversely related to the value of the resistance. High resistance = lower frequency

Is there any configuration of such an RC circuit where the relation is direct instead of inverse? Higher resistance = higher frequency? I was thinking along the lines of having a second resistance and getting to the ration of R1/(R2*C), but I can't figure out the circuit.

My use case for this is when R1 is replaced with a LDR. LDRs increase in resistance when light level goes down, but I would like the square wave frequency to increase instead when the light level goes down.

\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

You could consider using a 555 timer circuit that uses a constant current source to charge the voltage up on the charge capacitor. The constant current source requires normally 3 resistors to set the current and one of these resistors, when increased will linearly (to a point) create greater current as its value increases. A greater constant current (higher resistance) means the capacitor charges more quickly hence, F is proportional to R.

http://www.next.gr/uploads/64/555-IC-Linear-Ramp-Sawtooth-Generator-Oscillator.gif

Note that increasing R1 causes the charging current to be greater thus increasing the speed at which C1 charges and hence frequency rises. Circuit taken from here

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes. Indeed. Unfortunately this is a design that's based around and RC Inverter design and I can't change the chip at this point of time. \$\endgroup\$ – notthetup Nov 10 '14 at 8:28
  • \$\begingroup\$ @notthetup then you are probably out of luck unless you are prepared to add an extra transistor to shunt-discharge the cap when the schmitt trigger output rises high but then you are basically constructing a 555 timer in hardware. \$\endgroup\$ – Andy aka Nov 10 '14 at 10:25
  • \$\begingroup\$ @notthetup: What can you change? \$\endgroup\$ – EM Fields Nov 10 '14 at 12:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ I can add/remove passives, and maybe transistors. I am able to rewire the inverter as well. I just need to stick with the inverter. \$\endgroup\$ – notthetup Nov 10 '14 at 14:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.