25
\$\begingroup\$

I know that aircraft sometimes employ a 400Hz AC system to save weight on transformers, so I'd imagine that spacecraft might employ a similar technique. I'm wondering if anyone in the aerospace field can confirm 400Hz or higher frequency operation in space.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ In U.S. navy, aircraft can typically take 3 phase 440 V. And is standardized where possible (i.e. f-18, c-130.. ). \$\endgroup\$ – marshal craft Feb 7 '17 at 15:11
15
\$\begingroup\$

The situation with Voyeager is more complex than what was said in another answer above. Here are the details from NASA:

Power from the radioisotope thermoelectric generators is held at a constant 30 volts DC by a shunt regulator. The 30 volts are supplied directly to some spacecraft equipment and are switched to others in the power distribution subassembly. The main power inverter also is supplied the 30 volts DC for conversion to 2.4 kHz square wave AC used by most spacecraft subsystems. Again, the AC power may be supplied directly to equipment or can be switched on or off by power relays.

Among the users of DC power, in addition to the inverter, are the radio subsystem, gyros, propulsion isolation valves, some science instruments, most temperature control heaters and the motors that deployed the planetary radio astronomy antennas. Other elements of the spacecraft use the AC power.

There are two identical 2.4 kHz power inverters -- main and standby. The main inverter is on from launch and remains on throughout the mission. In case of malfunction or failure in the main inverter, the power chain, after a 1.5-second delay, is switched automatically to the standby inverter. Once the switchover is made, it is irreversible.

A 4.8 kHz sync and timing signal from the flight data subsystem is used as a frequency reference in the inverter. The frequency is divided by two and the output is 2.4 kHz. The AC regulation is accurate to .004 percent. The 4.8 kHz timing signal is sent, in turn, to the computer command subsystem, which contains the spacecraft's master clock.

So they used two parallel power distribution methods (DC and AC).

EDIT: And, yes, the AC was 50V RMS. Found a diagram in a later NASA conference:

enter image description here

From that conference, Viking was even more complex having additional 400 Hz AC inverters. There's also mention in that coference of Galileo having the same redundant inverter configuration as Voyager (but no other details, presumably because it was just in the design stage then).

From a GE Voyager design document, it seems Voyager was initially designed similary to Viking, having some 400 Hz busses, but was revised to use only 2.4 KHz AC in the last iteration. The reason for the use of 400 Hz equipment is obvious, i.e. sharing parts with aviation equipment. I'm guessing the 2.4 KHz equipment was reasonably easilly derived from the former (as the frequency is a multiple), but I haven't found the rationale for 2.4KHz AC said explicitly anywhere yet.

Here are the details on Viking, confirming use of some 400 Hz power buses:

The VO had 2.4-kHz single-phase, 400-Hz three-phase, regulated dc (30 V and 56 V) and unregulated dc (25 V to 50 V) power sources. Unregulated dc power was also provided for the VLC. Arrays of photovoltaic cells arranged on four double-section, folding solar panels furnished primary power for all Sunoriented operations. Two identical nickel-cadmium batteries were used as a secondary source of power for off-Sun operations and to share the load when power demand exceeded the solar array capability. Redundant power conditioning and distribution functions were provided with two battery chargers, two booster regulators, two 2.4-kHz inverters, two 400-Hz three-phase inverters, two 30-V dc converters, and associated power source logic and control and switching functions. (See the simplified block diagram in fig. 6.) The hardware, operating modes, and performance are described in detail in the section "Power Subsystem." The VO unregulated (raw) power bus was supplied by solar panels and batteries. These two power sources formed a dynamic system characterized by three stable in-flight operating modes, and a fourth short-term operating mode as follows: [it goes on for a couple of pages, so I've snipped the modes]

enter image description here

From the table V on p. 21 in NASA-HDBK-4001 (1998) Galileo and Magellan (both 1989) were the last NASA projects to use 2.4kHz AC; also from there I conclude that 2.4 kHz was pretty much a NASA standard for three decades; the first use mentioned in there is on Mariner-2 (1962). After 1990 however, Hubble, the 1992 Mars Observer, Cassini, and so forth all used only DC.

To investigate the use 400 Hz AC, it's worth looking at a Mariner V report:

The booster regulator was designed to operate with input voltage variations between 25 and 50 V. The power subsystem included two booster regulators: (1) a maneuver booster regulator to power a 2.4-kHz single-phase inverter and a 400-Hz three-phase inverter for attitude control and gyro power during spacecraft maneuvers, and (2) a main booster regulator that drove a 2.4-KHz single-phase inverter that supplied power to all spacecraft and scientific instruments throughout the mission.

So it seems that (three-phase) 400 Hz had some, but relatively limited use in NASA craft: mostly for gyros and attitude control, while they also used 2.4 kHz single phase AC power for many more subsystems. I cannot find any mention of 400 Hz equipment in Galileo / Magellan documentation (which is unfortunately pretty spread out). So it seems that the 400 Hz AC equipment, being more niche was phased out first, probably around Voyager's time.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I don't know what the Soviets did by the way, but I suspect their space tech might have followed a similar evolution (perhaps more delayed). Unfortunately this kind of power distribution info isn't "sexy" enough to go into secondary sources, and I'm not really adept at reading Russian primary sources (even if they're online, which might not even be the case.) \$\endgroup\$ – Fizz Feb 14 '15 at 17:46
26
\$\begingroup\$

Most spacecraft use DC power distribution systems with high efficiency DC to DC converters. This is because all power sources on spacecraft are DC - solar arrays, batteries, fuel cells, RTGs, etc. Airplanes use generators connected to the engines for power, so using AC is straightforward. On a spacecraft, since it always starts with DC, there is no point in converting it to AC for distribution just to convert it back to DC later. (Well, switching power supplies do convert it to AC and back internally, but it is not distributed as AC). Much like common switching power supplies in computers and other consumer electronics, the DC to DC converters on spacecraft will operate at high frequencies (kHz or MHz) to save space. However, there is a tradeoff at some point against switching losses. I would imagine that in some cases they will use a lower switching frequency (at the expense of larger components) for an efficiency gain where necessary.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ If someone wants to find information backing up this answer (which I believe is correct), the NASA Technical Reports Server at ntrs.nasa.gov is the place to go. NASA's work is mainly funded by government money, and thus most of the reports are public. Try searches like "spacecraft power distribution" or something of that quality, and limit your searches to topics related to electronics, using advanced search. \$\endgroup\$ – zebonaut Feb 14 '15 at 12:54
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Dear zebonaut, I am holding you personally responsible for the countless hours of my life I will spend browsing that link, thank you, I think. \$\endgroup\$ – dataBus Feb 14 '15 at 22:26
  • \$\begingroup\$ @dataBus Heh. That's exactly why I limited my effort to a short comment this time and didn't go so far as to search for all the various types of power systems used in the history of space travel, putting them into a full answer. \$\endgroup\$ – zebonaut Feb 16 '15 at 7:29
12
\$\begingroup\$

The Voyager probes had a 50 V square wave 2.4 kHz power supply which necessitated filtering out from the radio data at 2.4 kHz and 7.2 kHz (the next most significant overtone in a square wave). source

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yup - noise/inductance is another really good reason to stick to DC throughout. \$\endgroup\$ – Dewi Morgan Feb 14 '15 at 0:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ Interesting fact. Does anyone know why they chose this unusual power distribution solution? \$\endgroup\$ – Fizz Feb 14 '15 at 15:16
  • \$\begingroup\$ Also, there's no voltage indicated in that source you cited (only freq.) and Wikipedia says 30V DC (not 50V) for the RTG itself. \$\endgroup\$ – Fizz Feb 14 '15 at 15:22
  • \$\begingroup\$ @RespawnedFluff I got it from there and there \$\endgroup\$ – Michel Rouzic Feb 15 '15 at 0:39
30
\$\begingroup\$

I've built payloads for a dozen suborbital shots and one satellite. AC was never used. As our missions were not really long-duration interplanetary trips, we used commercially-available DC-DC converters built to aerospace standards. The satellite, I believe, is still functioning after about 6 or seven years. Converter frequencies were, I believe, about 550 KHz.

What NASA does for its missions, I don't know, although I expect they roll their own.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.