I am trying to get real-time data feed from a homemade weather balloon radiosonde with the objective of sending HD video during the flight; this could be relevant for GoPro-ers who want to send their images during their adventures rather than storing them on onboard memory or to have data sent to multiple places to decrease the chances of data loss due to destruction of the onboard memory during the adventure. It could also be used for disaster communication, remote location communication, or rescue operations.

I plan to use a 2.4GHz 6dBi antenna in the payload (http://www.l-com.com/wireless-antenna-24-ghz-6-dbi-omnidirectional-antenna-n-female-connector ) and two 18dBi ground stations of the same frequency (http://www.titanwirelessonline.com/Ubiquiti-NanoBridgeM-2GHz-18dBi-p/cp-nb2m-18.htm). I want to have the two ground stations and space them out to allow for better reception and a better chance of getting data as the payload rotates and increases in altitude.The network is also not part of ISM spectrum, employing IEEE802.15.4A, allowing me to take advantage of higher operating Tx power while remaining in the unlicensed range.

Now I have read about aiming and reflecting and the like for buildings and/or radio towers which don’t move. Does anyone have any good experience, knowledge or resources where I can find how to calculate the best gain level vs vertical beam width for ranges 0-80,000 ft, the placement of the ground stations such that they lie in the beam width following the GPS data received via full duplex, and the hardware used for a moving transmitter and receiver?

  • \$\begingroup\$ Start by drawing a scale diagram of the flight envelope... Up 30 km, across between 0 and say 200 km? and calculating the angle and range from balloon to ground. This should give you an idea of the patterns the balloon needs. The 6 dBi omni is probably not suitable. \$\endgroup\$
    – tomnexus
    Commented Mar 5, 2015 at 22:03
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks @tomnexus The actual gain pattern I need would be similar to ceiling antennas like this one l-com.com/copyrighted_images/pattern_hg2403cu.gif found here: l-com.com/…. Still, I understand that at a higher gain, I'll be sacrificing beam width. I want the best possible ratio to get the most data for the longest time, I want to get better ideas of how to place my ground stations with respect to that calculated ratio & which antennas would give me that ratio. Any thoughts/resources on how to calculate that? \$\endgroup\$
    – S Booth
    Commented Mar 7, 2015 at 15:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ @tomnexus I am entirely comfortable with building/constructing my own antenna: I am actually a mechanical engineering student & would prefer to do so, only I don't understand antennas well enough to design one knowing the gain patterns I want. If you have any resources on that, I would greatly appreciate being linked up to them! \$\endgroup\$
    – S Booth
    Commented Mar 7, 2015 at 15:48
  • \$\begingroup\$ Also, @tomnexus now that I am leaning more, I don't think it is technically mesh networking since it will be one node in the payload transmitting and two nodes receiving, not all the nodes communicating with one another. Also, I am not sure if using antennas which say they are 802.11 compatible will cause problems with 802.15.4A. \$\endgroup\$
    – S Booth
    Commented Mar 8, 2015 at 17:33
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ My advice would be, don't try to design your own antenna's from scratch! You may be studying mechanical engineering, but this is RF engineering and the proper design of antennas is not trivial. Stick to off-the-shelf designs which you can purchase, or copy an existing design but modify it for the frequency you are operating at. \$\endgroup\$
    – Dean
    Commented May 18, 2015 at 16:26

1 Answer 1


It seems that in the RC, FPV, and drone-enthusiasts communities a "cloverleaf" antenna is very popular for life-streaming applications in flight.

enter image description here

Information, design plans, as well as shops, can be found plenty using your favorite search engine.

Some information here and here (I have no affiliation with any product, commercially or otherwise)

There are various benefits of this antenna.

It is circular polarized, meaning that you do not have to exactly "line up" the receiving antenna as you would with a linear (H or V) polarized antenna. Best is to receive with a circular polarized antenna of course.

The circular polarized signals has the advantage that it has "better penetration properties" compared to linear polarized signals. Thus improves your reception even when objects, trees, buildings (to some extend) are in the signal path. It is probably this, which makes the antenna popular for applications such as posted here.



Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.