3
\$\begingroup\$

I've seen N channel MOSFETs as high side switches of H bridges quite often, which requires a charge pump to drive. Wouldn't a P channel MOSFET be easier, simply isolating the microcontroller command from the gate source voltage? Why use the N channels instead then?

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Well, then you need the charge pump to turn it off instead of on, not much difference \$\endgroup\$ – PlasmaHH Apr 14 '15 at 10:34
  • \$\begingroup\$ @PlasmaHH, there's quite a difference. You need only a transistor to control a P-channel MOSFET. \$\endgroup\$ – avakar Apr 14 '15 at 11:12
  • \$\begingroup\$ And the difference is, fundamentally, that using P-channel on the high side, the control voltages are all bounded by the motor supply rails. The charge pump (or some other aux supply) is needed to generate a control voltage above the supply. \$\endgroup\$ – user_1818839 Apr 14 '15 at 11:38
  • \$\begingroup\$ @avakar if decent efficiency is to be realized on medium to high power H bridges, a single transistor is not enough to control a P channel MOSFET - it would need a push-pull driver and this will need some form of charge pump on medium to high voltage supplies. \$\endgroup\$ – Andy aka Apr 14 '15 at 11:51
9
\$\begingroup\$

P-channel MOSFETs tend to have a higher Rds(on), making them less efficient (for the same price). For a small H-bridge, the simplicity of using them makes them practical

However, for high power applications, the extra complexity of driving N channel FETs can be justified by improved efficiency from lower Rds(on).

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.