0
\$\begingroup\$

Right, I have a very simple circuit that I aim to use as a delay circuit, everything was going fine until I started to over think it all and now I have totally confused myself and it is slightly embarrassing.

This is my circuit:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

As you can see, nice and simple. I know the time constant of the capacitor is RC to reach 63% of the voltage, but my issue is what is the voltage that it is reaching 63% of? I initially thought the 2V supply (capped at 1V though) that I am using at R2, but then it would charge to 1V in less than RC (not what I want).

I take the time constant as \$1M\Omega \times 1 \mu F = 1\$s but would that be the time to charge to 63% of 2V (but cap out at 1V) or 63% 1V (i.e. take 5 times longer to get to 1V)?

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ If you removed the capacitor from your circuit what would be the (maximum) voltage you could get at the junction of R1 & R2? \$\endgroup\$ – JIm Dearden Apr 27 '15 at 13:31
  • \$\begingroup\$ @JImDearden As mentioned, 1V \$\endgroup\$ – MrPhooky Apr 27 '15 at 13:31
  • \$\begingroup\$ and 63% of 2V is? \$\endgroup\$ – JIm Dearden Apr 27 '15 at 13:35
  • \$\begingroup\$ 2V across 2 series 1Mohm resistors produces 1V and this is equivalent to having a 1V supply in series with two parallel 1Mohm resistors OR a 1V supply in series with 500kohm \$\endgroup\$ – Andy aka Apr 27 '15 at 13:39
  • \$\begingroup\$ @JImDearden 1.26V... Are you being purposefully patronizing? \$\endgroup\$ – MrPhooky Apr 27 '15 at 13:44
1
\$\begingroup\$

Well... Let's calculate it using Laplace transform.

$$ T(s)=\frac{\frac{\frac{1}{sC}\cdot R_{2}}{\frac{1}{sC}+ R_{2}}}{\frac{\frac{1}{sC}\cdot R_{2}}{\frac{1}{sC}+ R_{2}}+R_{1}}=\frac{R_{2}}{R_{1}+R_{2}+sC\cdot R_{1}R_{2}}=\frac{R_{2}}{R_{1}+R_{2}}\cdot \frac{1}{1+sC\cdot \frac{R_{1}R_{2}}{R_{1}+R_{2}}} $$ You can see, that we have a resistor divider and RC filter with time constant equal:

$$ \tau = C\cdot \frac{R_{1}R_{2}}{R_{1}+R_{2}}=0.5s $$

So in 0.5s time, you will have a 0.63% of input voltage multiplied by resistor divider - 2V * 0.5 * 63% = 0.63V

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

Continuing from where @przeski left off, I was curious to see what the transient response of Vout would look like. The following code was written:

t = 0:0.001:100;
Vin = 2;
R1 = 1e6;
R2 = 1e6;
C = 1e-6;

den = R1+R2+(j*(R1*R2*C*2*pi)./t);
Vout = (Vin*R2)./den;
Vout = abs(Vout);
y = 0.63.*(t>0);
plot(t,Vout);
hold on;
plot(t,y);

The output resulted in the following response:

enter image description here

To answer your question yes it is 63 % of 1V this is as a result of the voltage divider present.

An interesting finding.

I know we shouldn't pose questions in the answers section, but i noticed this in my results.

Looking the the graph we can see that the 63% of the steady state value is achieved at 2.54 sec.

I continued to solve the equation given by:

$$ \frac{V_{in}R_{2}}{(R_{1}R_{2})+jR_{1}R_{2}\omega C} $$

This was obtained by applying the voltage divider rule treating the capacitor as a reactance.

$$ 0.63 = \left |\frac{V_{in}R_{2}}{(R_{1}R_{2})+jR_{1}R_{2}\omega C} \right | $$

$$ 0.63 = \frac{V_{in}R_{2}}{\sqrt{(R_{1}R_{2})^{2}+(R_{1}R_{2}\omega C)^{2}}} $$

$$ 0.63 = \frac{2\times 10^{6}}{\sqrt{(2\times 10^{6})^{2}+\frac{(2\times\pi \times10^{6} )^{2}}{t}}} $$

Solving for t we obtain 2.5485 seconds.

The Question is, is this the time constant, 2.5485sec?

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

You are right ,the time constant is t=RC=1000000ohms*0,000001F=1second.
Your supply voltage is 2V,so that's the voltage the capacitor will have when it's fully charged;every capacitor will reach 63% of the supply voltage in one time constant.These are confirmed by this site:http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/rc/rc_1.html

In conclusion,after one second,the capacitor will have 1,26 volts across it.

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.