1
\$\begingroup\$

I have a 600ppr quadrature encoder that I would like to get the highest possible resolution out of. I need sub arc/second accuracy for my project.

I saw differential Manchester encoding as a solution but what is the standard way to increase resolution on a quadrature encoder?

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Does this encoder produce analog or digital signals? \$\endgroup\$ – Olin Lathrop May 6 '15 at 18:53
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Differential manchester encoding has nothing to do with increasing resolution. \$\endgroup\$ – Andy aka May 6 '15 at 19:38
  • \$\begingroup\$ Add additional emitter/sensors to the encoder ring at a different phase angle, or mechanically gear it. \$\endgroup\$ – Optionparty May 6 '15 at 21:20
  • \$\begingroup\$ What does "600 ppr (Single-phase 600 ppr, Two phase 4 frequency doubling to 2400 pulses)" mean then? \$\endgroup\$ – uMinded May 6 '15 at 22:19
3
\$\begingroup\$

Regardless of the output of your existing encoder, you'll never get what you want from it. In order to get 1 second of arc resolution, the encoder will need 360 x 60 x 60 ppr, or just about 1.3 million ppr.

If you have analog (sine) outputs, you might optimistically hope for x100 interpolation, but that still gives you 60k ppr, or more than an order of magnitude less than you need. Plus, units with nominal resolution this low don't ordinarily have good sine outputs.

What total angular range do you need to produce and measure? If you need 360 degree azimuth capabilities, you might look into high-end telescope mounts. This, http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=&sku=1059016&gclid=CjwKEAjw96aqBRDNhM6MtJfE-wYSJADiMfggqATnClg6dU22LzlKee3LraQYf7j2-gto9peKS5BnLxoC0-Hw_wcB&Q=&is=REG&A=details for instance, is rated for a resolution of .06 seconds, although it has a (correctible) periodic error of 5 seconds. At $2500, it may be a little rich for your blood.

Alternatively, you can look into motorized rotary stages, again for serious bucks. Edmund Scientific, for instance, has http://www.edmundoptics.com/optomechanics/positioning-stages-slides/motorized-positioners/zaber-motorized-rotary-stage-system/3305/ which will give you 4.1 urad resolution, which is about what you want.

If you're looking for a shaft angle encoder, you can get what you want. Here's an example http://www.gpi-encoders.com/PDF/9480H.pdf Note the size. Also note that price is not listed. I'd expect multi-kilobucks, although I might be wrong.

Please be aware that, what ever you wind up with, you will need to provide extraordinary levels of mechanical precision. The slightest bit of runout will cause problems. Dimensional changes in your system due to temperature variations will also be a problem. Lots of luck.

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

It's not possible to interpolate between encoder ticks. Either get a higher resolution encoder or gear it up so that it completes multiple revolutions for each turn of the shaft you're interested in.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ This is not true. It is possible to do some interpolation if the encoder output signals are analog, which is why I asked this in a comment to the question. If they are digital, then you're right. You only get the 4 different states per cycle. \$\endgroup\$ – Olin Lathrop May 8 '15 at 13:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.