I'm looking to design a circuit around the CN3065 that will be solar powered with a li-ion backup battery. I've seen circuits that can achieve this by using a charge controller with a dedicated load output, but CN3065 doesn't have one (and unfortunately I'm restricted to this chip since SeedStudio's OPL has no other charge controllers.)

The basic recommended circuit is as follows:

Typical CN3065 circuit

I'm reluctant to connect the load just over the battery terminals since this would presumably upset the charger, but most load sharing circuitry I've seen is designed for a constant input voltage rather than a solar panel:

Charger circuit with load sharing

My worry is that enough current will flow through Q1 to block current through the battery, but this will not be sufficient to drive the microcontroller attached to the load. I could place a (for example) 5V zener at the gate of Q1 to get around this, but then I'm back at the problem where I'm potentially charging the battery partially whilst drawing a load across it.

What supporting circuitry should I add to safely and sensibly connect a load to this circuit when the input power supply is given by a solar cell?


1 Answer 1


I'm reluctant to connect the load just over the battery terminals since this would presumably upset the charger,

Direct connection of load to battery + charger out is not a totally terrible solution. Whether it is acceptable depends on application and circumstances.

Adding a load will drop even a fully charged battery to < 4.2V and charger will attempt to charge in CC (constant current mode) at whatever current it is set to (as controlled by Riset. If Icc is > Iload the charger will raise the battery + load voltage to 4.2V then change to CV (constant voltage) mode and maintain voltage at 4.2V.

The CN3065 termiantes charging when Icharge = C/10 where C is the programmed charging rate = 1800/RIset.
If Iload > C/10 then the charger will remain in the CV charge mode at 4.2V and the battery will be subject to a constant 4.2V. This will shorten battery life if used in this mode for long periods but may be acceptable in prototype or one-off applications.

If Iload < C/10 then the charge cycle will terminate when Ibattery = (C/10-Iload). This will also shorten battery life but less than in the previous case.

Improved load switch control:
You could drive Q1 with a comparator that compares Vbat with Vin.
When Vin > Vbat + Vextra, Q1 is turned off, where Vextra is enough extra voltage to make up for the drop in D1.

A comparator across D1 will implement this "well enough" - when D1 conducts current is flowing to the load from Vin and the battery can be turned off. When you turn off Q1, if the PV panel cannot support the load its voltage will drop and again enable the battery,

With this scheme (and many other load sharing schemes) there is some risk of oscillation between modes. This can be addressed with hysteresis and addition of a degree of delay in the switching. Operating Q1 in a linear mode rather than on/off so you get a smooth changeover probably helps. Dissipation in Q1 will be small as voltage differential need not be large. For Vin more than say about (V_diode_drop + 0.2V) MOSFET can be fully off. As Vin exceeds Vbat + V_diode_drop MOSFET can start to turn off.

enter image description here

The "ideal" solution is for Q1 and D1 to be "ideal diodes" with minimal voltage drop when conducting. Almost as good is to have D1 as a diode as at present and Q1 replaced with an ideal diode. An ideal diode can be implemented with Q1 and an added opamp or purpose built "ideal diode" controller ICs are available.

These devices implement ideal diodes when used with an external MOSFET such as Q1. I'm not recommending this specific device, but it shows the principle.

enter image description here

  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks very much, that's exactly what I was after - the current project I'm using this for is in deep sleep consuming microamps for all but 5 seconds every minute, so I may just connect across the battery. For future projects though using the linear amplifier definitely looks like a neat trick! \$\endgroup\$
    – berry120
    May 10, 2015 at 1:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.