1
\$\begingroup\$

I'm looking for an explanation about what type of relation have antenna gain with it's efficiency.

For example I want to use a ceramic antenna that is a dipole antenna. It has:

  • Average Gain of -0.5 dBi typ. (XZ-V)
  • Return Loss 9.5 dB min.
  • Input Power 3W

and not more details.

Antenna Gain worth something in antenna efficiency? That mean that I have 0.5dB gain in one direction and -0.5dB in another. But if I want an omnidirectional antenna, should I choose 0dB gain?

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Gain for antennas is really just a measurement of directionality. \$\endgroup\$ – PlasmaHH Jun 1 '15 at 11:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ Ok, but from PCB antenna to ceramic antenna, I've some kind of gain? If so, which value tell me that ceramic antenna allow me more distance trasmission? \$\endgroup\$ – Yaro Jun 1 '15 at 12:01
  • \$\begingroup\$ for tx, if you feed in 100W, you can only ever distribute 100W. There is no way an antenna design could magically make it be 200W distributed. All it can do is distribute most of it into one direction, leaving less into the other. The datasheet of the antenna will tell you details about that. \$\endgroup\$ – PlasmaHH Jun 1 '15 at 12:04
  • \$\begingroup\$ Gain of -0.5dB suggests it's pretty close to omnidirectional. \$\endgroup\$ – Brian Drummond Jun 1 '15 at 12:08
6
\$\begingroup\$

Antenna efficiency is generally taken as the amount of total power radiated (in all directions) divided by the electrical power put into the antenna. It is not related to antenna gain.

Antenna gain is something a little more complex. A mathematical device called an "isotropic antenna" is a theoretical antenna that emits power equally in all directions. This is the base line for a lot of comparisons between antennas. No such antenna exists but it is still a good device for making comparisons.

An antenna that bunches the emitted power up so that it produces more watts/sq meter in one direction compared to a different direction is generally specified as having gain. A dipole antenna will concentrate power like this: -

enter image description here

It has a gain that slightly exceeds (by 2.15dB) the 0 dBi mark on the polar diagrams. Note I used the term "dBi" to indicate gain relative to the theoretical isotropic device.

So, an antenna with "gain" must has directionality - it forces more watts per sq meter in some directions and fewer watts per sq metre in other directions.

Antenna gain works equally in transmit as it does receive - an antenna with higher gain will collect more watts and convert them to more volts in its "optimum" direction than it does in other directions.

A receiving antenna has, what is known as, an aperture (think of it as a net which it catches radiated power - the bigger the net the more power it catches).

Both efficiency and gain need to be considered together though - an antenna with significant gain may still not be a good emitter if the efficiency is poor.

\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

RF antennas or aerials do not radiate equally in all directions. It is found that any realisable RF antenna design will radiate more in some directions than others. The actual pattern is dependent upon the type of antenna design, its size, the environment and a variety of other factors. This directional pattern can be used to ensure that the power radiated is focused in the desired directions.

It is normal to refer to the directional patterns and gain in terms of the transmitted signal. It is often easier to visualise the RF antenna is terms of its radiated power, however the antenna performs in an exactly equivalent manner for reception, having identical figures and specifications.

Read more: http://electronicsforu.com/technology-trends/news/antenna-gain-directivity

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.